Safety

The capabilities of an OpenFOAM solver to reproduce the transition of stoichiometric H2-air mixtures to detonation in obstructed 2-D channels were tested. The process is challenging numerically as it involves the ignition of a flame kernel its subsequent propagation and acceleration interaction with obstacles formation of shock waves ahead and detonation onset (DO). Two different obstacle configurations were considered in 10-mm high × 1-m long channels: (i) wavy walls (WW) that mimic the behavior of fencetype obstacles but prevent abrupt area changes. In this case flame acceleration (FA) is strongly affected by shock-flame interactions and DO often results from the compression of the gas present between the accelerating flame front and a converging section of the channel. (ii) Fence-type (FT) obstacles. In this case FA is driven by the increase in flame surface area as a result of the interaction of the flame front with the unburned gas flow field ahead particularly downstream of obstacles; shock-flame interactions play a role at the later stages of FA and DO takes place upon reflection of precursor shocks from obstacles. The effect of initial pressure p0 = 25 50 and 100 kPa at constant blockage ratio (BR = 0.6) was investigated and compared for both configurations. Results show that for the same initial pressure (p0 = 50 kPa) the obstacle configurations could lead to different final propagation regimes: a quasi-detonation for WW and a choked-flame for FT due to the increased losses for the latter. At p0 = 25 kPa however while both configurations result in choked flames WW seem to exhibit larger velocity deficits than FT due to longer flame-precursor shock distances during quasi-steady propagation and to the increased presence of unburnt mixture downstream of the tip of the flame that homogeneously explodes providing additional support to the propagation of the flame.

This study focuses on development of a CFD model able to simulate the experimentally observed critical nozzle diameter for hydrogen non-premixed flames. The critical diameter represents the minimum nozzle size through which a free jet flame will remain stable at all driving pressures. Hydrogen non-premixed flames will not blow-out at diameters equal to or greater than the critical diameter. Accurate simulation of this parameter is important for assessment of thermally activated pressure relief device (TPRD) performance during hydrogen blowdown from a storage tank. At TPRD diameters below the critical value there is potential for a hydrogen jet flame to blow-out as the storage tank vents potentially leading to hydrogen accumulation in an indoor release scenario. Previous experimental studies have indicated that the critical diameter for hydrogen is approximately 1 mm. In this study flame stability is considered across a range of diameters and overpressures from 0.1 mm to 2 mm and from 0.2 MPa to 20 MPa respectively. The impact of turbulent Schmidt number Sct which is the ratio of momentum diffusivity (kinematic viscosity) and mass diffusivity on the hydrogen concentration profile in the region near the nozzle exit and subsequent influence on critical diameter was investigated and discussed. For lower Sct values the enhanced mass mixing resulted in smaller predicted critical diameters. The use of value Sct=0.61 in the model demonstrated the best agreement with experimental values of the critical diameter. The model reproduced the critical diameter of 1 mm and then was applied to predict flame stability for under-expanded hydrogen jets.

Hydrogen offers the UK a unique opportunity to deliver on our Net Zero ambitions enabling deep decarbonisation of the parts of the energy system that are challenging to electrify balancing the energy system by providing large scale long duration energy storage and reducing pressure on electricity infrastructure. The UK Government in recognition of the centrality of hydrogen to the future energy system has set a 10GW hydrogen production ambition to be achieved by 2030. This ambition and its supporting policies such as the Hydrogen Business Model the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard and the Hydrogen Transport and Storage Business Models will unlock private sector investment and kick-start the UK’s hydrogen activity. Encouragingly the UK has a positive track record of deploying low carbon technologies. The  combination of the UK’s world leading policies and incentive schemes alongside a vibrant  Research Development and Innovation (RD&I)  and engineering environment has enabled rapid  deployment of technologies such as offshore wind  and electric vehicles. Yet despite being world leaders  in deployment early opportunities for regional  supply chain growth and job creation were not fully  realised and taken advantage of from inception. The  hydrogen sector is therefore at a tipping point. To  capitalise on the economic opportunity hydrogen  offers the UK must learn from prior technology  deployments and build a strong domestic hydrogen  supply chain in parallel to championing deployment.

Hydrogen is unique amongst low carbon  technologies. It represents a significant economic  opportunity with future hydrogen markets estimated  by the Hydrogen Innovation Initiative to be worth  $8tn and hydrogen technology markets estimated to reach $1tn by 20501 but crucially it is also still a nascent market. Unlike many other low carbon technologies where supply chains are already well established hydrogen supply chains are embryonic meaning that the UK has an opportunity to anchor these supply chains here and establish itself as a global leader.

The UK is well placed to capitalise on this opportunity with favourable geography and geology  that enables us to produce and store hydrogen cost effectively coupled with a strong pipeline of hydrogen projects a stable policy environment that is attractive to investors and a wealth of transferable skills and expertise from the oil and gas industry.

We must ensure that alongside our focus on deployment we are also investing in technology and supply chains. Not only will this deliver exponential economic benefits from the projects supported by Government but it will also enable us to tackle increasing global supply chain constraints. Hydrogen UK estimated in its Economic Impact Assessment that hydrogen could deliver 30000 jobs annually and £7bn of GVA by 2030

It is important to be targeted and strategic in our investment and activities and recognise that hydrogen represents a wide range of technologies and the UK should not expect to lead in every area. Hydrogen UK with the support of the Hydrogen Delivery Council has undertaken analysis of the hydrogen value chain building on UK strengths and identifying the high value items that can deliver significant impact and benefit to the UK. We have also conducted widespread engagement with project developers to identify the barriers to utilising UK technology in projects and with technology developers to identify the challenges and barriers to investing and siting development and manufacturing in the UK.

The report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.

In the present work we present the results of numerical simulations involving the dispersion and combustion of a hydrogen cloud released in an empty tunnel. The simulations were conducted with the use of ADREA-HF CFD code and the results are compared with measurements from experiments conducted by HSE in a tunnel with the exact same geometry. The length of the tunnel is equal to 70 m and the maximum height from the floor is equal to 3.25 m. Hydrogen release is considered to occur from a train containing pressurized hydrogen stored at 580 bars. The release diameter is equal to 4.7 mm and the release direction is upwards. Initially dispersion simulation was performed in order to define the initial conditions for the deflagration simulations. The effect of the initial wind speed and the effect of the ignition delay time were investigated. An extensive grid sensitivity study was conducted in order to achieve grid independent results. The CFD model takes into account the flame instabilities that are developed as the flame propagates inside the tunnel and turbulence that exists in front of the flame front. Pressure predictions are compared against experimental measurements revealing a very good performance of the CFD model.

For the safe and efficient utilization of hydrogen-enriched natural gas combustion in industrial gas-fired boilers the present study adopted a combination of numerical simulation and field tests to investigate its adaptability. Firstly the combustion characteristics of hydrogen-enriched natural gas with different hydrogen blending ratios and equivalence ratios were evaluated by using the Chemkin Pro platform. Secondly a field experimental study was carried out based on the WNS2- 1.25-Q gas-fired boiler to investigate the boiler’s thermal efficiency heat loss and pollutant emissions after hydrogen addition. The results show that at the same equivalence ratio with the hydrogen blending ratio increasing from 0% to 25% the laminar flame propagation speed of the fuel increases the extinction strain rate rises and the combustion limit expands. The laminar flame propagation speed of premixed methane/air gas reaches the maximum value when the equivalence ratio is 1.0 and the combustion intensity of the flame is the highest at this time. In the field tests as the hydrogen blending ratio increases from 0% to nearly 10% with the increasing excess air ratio the boiler’s thermal efficiency decreases as well as the NOx emission. This indicates that there exists a tradeoff between the boiler thermal efficiency and NOx emission in practice.

The transition to hydrogen as a clean energy source is critical for addressing climate change and supporting environmental sustainability. This review provides an accessible summary of general research trends in hydrogen risk assessment methodologies enabling diverse stakeholders including researchers policymakers and industry professionals to gain insights into this field. By examining representative studies across theoretical experimental and simulation-based approaches the review highlights prominent trends and applications within academia and industry. The key focus is on evaluating risks in stationary and transportation applications paying particular attention to hydrogen storage systems transportation infrastructures and energy systems. By offering a concise yet informative summary of hydrogen risk assessment trends this paper aims to serve as a foundational resource for fostering safer and more sustainable hydrogen systems.

With the advancement of Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCVs) detecting hydrogen leaks is critically important in facilities such as hydrogen refilling stations. Despite its significance the dynamic response performance of hydrogen sensors in confined spaces particularly under ceilings has not been comprehensively assessed. This study utilizes a catalytic combustion hydrogen sensor to monitor hydrogen leaks in a confined area. It examines the effects of leak size and placement height on the distribution of hydrogen concentrations beneath the ceiling. Results indicate that hydrogen concentration rapidly decreases within a 0.5–1.0 m range below the ceiling and declines more gradually from 1.0 to 2.0 m. The study further explores the attenuation pattern of hydrogen concentration radially from the hydrogen jet under the ceiling. By normalizing the radius and concentration it was determined that the distribution conforms to a Gaussian model akin to that observed in open space jet flows. Utilizing this Gaussian assumption the model is refined by incorporating an impact reflux term thereby enhancing the accuracy of the predictive formula.

In international regulations on explosion protection mechanical friction impact or abrasion is usually named as one of 13 ignition sources that must be avoided in hazardous zones with explosive atmospheres. In different studies it is even identified as one of the most frequent ignition sources in practice. The effectiveness of mechanical impacts as ignition source is dependent from several parameters including the minimum ignition energy of the explosive atmosphere the properties of the material pairing the kinetic impact energy or the impact velocity. By now there is no standard procedure to determine the effectiveness of mechanical impacts as ignition source. In some previous works test procedures with poor reproducibility or undefined kinetic impact energy were applied for this purpose. In other works only homogeneous material pairings were considered. In this work the effectiveness of mechanical impacts with defined and reproducible kinetic impact energy as ignition source for hydrogen containing atmospheres was studied systematically in dependence from the inhomogeneous material pairing considering materials with practical relevance like stainless steel low alloy steel concrete and non-iron-metals. It was found that ignition can be avoided if non-iron metals are used in combination with different metallic materials but in combination with concrete even the impact of non-iron-metals can be an effective ignition source if the kinetic impact energy is not further limited. Moreover the consequence of hydrogen admixture to natural gas on the effectiveness of mechanical impacts as ignition source was studied. In many cases ignition of atmospheres containing natural gas by mechanical impacts is rather unlikely. No influence could be observed for admixtures up to 25% hydrogen and even more. The results are mainly relevant in the context of repurposing the natural gas grid or adding hydrogen to the natural gas grid. Based on the test results it can be evaluated under which circumstances the use of tools made of non-iron-metals or other non-sparking materials can be an effective measure to avoid ignition sources in hazardous zones containing hydrogen for example during maintenance work.

The use of alternative fuels is a primary means for decarbonising the maritime industry. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid ammonia (LNH3) are liquified gases among the alternative fuels. The safety risks associated with these fuels differ from traditional fuels. In addition to their low-temperature hazards the flammability of LNG and LH2 and the high toxicity of LNH3 present challenges in fuel handlings due to their high likelihood of fuel release during bunkering. This study aims at drawing extensive comparisons of the evaporation and vapour dispersion behaviours for the three fuels after release accidents during bunkering and discuss their safety issues. The study involved the release event of the three fuels on the main deck area of a reference bulk carrier with a deadweight of 208000 tonnes. Two release scenarios were considered: Scenario 1 involved a release of 0.3 m3 of fuel and Scenario 2 involved a release of 100 kg of fuel. An empirical equation was used to calculate the fuel evaporation process and the Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) code FDS was employed to simulate the dispersion of vapour clouds. The obtained results reveal that LH2 has the highest evaporation rate followed by LNG and LNH3. The vapour clouds of LNG and LNH3 spread along the main deck surface while the LH2 vapour cloud exhibits upward dispersion. The flammable vapour clouds of LNG and LH2 remain within the main deck area whereas the toxic gas cloud of LNH3 disperses towards the shore and spreads near the ground on the shore side. Based on the dispersion behaviours the hazards of LNG and LH2 are com parable while LNH3 poses significantly higher hazards. In terms of hazard mitigations effective water curtain systems can suppress the vapour dispersion.

A field test series where a composite pressure vessel for hydrogen is exploded by fire 1) to provide the facts and the data for the safety distance based on overpressure; 2) to validate the current status of mitigation barrier per KGS FP216 and further designs for developments of the codes and standards relating to hydrogen refueling stations. A pair of barriers to be tested are installed approximately 4 m apart standing face to face. The explosion source is a type-4 composite vessel of 175 L filled with compressed hydrogen up to 70 MPa. The vessel is in the middle of the barriers and the body part is heated with an LPG burner until it blows out. The incident overpressures from the blast are measured with 40 high-speed pressure sensors which are respectively installed 2 to 32 m away from the explosion. In the tests with the barrier constructed per the current status of KGS FP216 the explosion of the vessel resulted in partial destruction of the reinforced concrete barrier and made the steel plate barrier dissociated from the foundation then flew away approximately 25 m. The peak overpressure was 14.65 kPa at 32 m. The test data will be further analyzed to select the barriers for the subsequent tests and to develop the codes and standards for hydrogen refueling stations.