Publications

Hydrogen offers the UK a unique opportunity to deliver on our Net Zero ambitions enabling deep decarbonisation of the parts of the energy system that are challenging to electrify balancing the energy system by providing large scale long duration energy storage and reducing pressure on electricity infrastructure. The UK Government in recognition of the centrality of hydrogen to the future energy system has set a 10GW hydrogen production ambition to be achieved by 2030. This ambition and its supporting policies such as the Hydrogen Business Model the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard and the Hydrogen Transport and Storage Business Models will unlock private sector investment and kick-start the UK’s hydrogen activity. Encouragingly the UK has a positive track record of deploying low carbon technologies. The  combination of the UK’s world leading policies and incentive schemes alongside a vibrant  Research Development and Innovation (RD&I)  and engineering environment has enabled rapid  deployment of technologies such as offshore wind  and electric vehicles. Yet despite being world leaders  in deployment early opportunities for regional  supply chain growth and job creation were not fully  realised and taken advantage of from inception. The  hydrogen sector is therefore at a tipping point. To  capitalise on the economic opportunity hydrogen  offers the UK must learn from prior technology  deployments and build a strong domestic hydrogen  supply chain in parallel to championing deployment.

Hydrogen is unique amongst low carbon  technologies. It represents a significant economic  opportunity with future hydrogen markets estimated  by the Hydrogen Innovation Initiative to be worth  $8tn and hydrogen technology markets estimated to reach $1tn by 20501 but crucially it is also still a nascent market. Unlike many other low carbon technologies where supply chains are already well established hydrogen supply chains are embryonic meaning that the UK has an opportunity to anchor these supply chains here and establish itself as a global leader.

The UK is well placed to capitalise on this opportunity with favourable geography and geology  that enables us to produce and store hydrogen cost effectively coupled with a strong pipeline of hydrogen projects a stable policy environment that is attractive to investors and a wealth of transferable skills and expertise from the oil and gas industry.

We must ensure that alongside our focus on deployment we are also investing in technology and supply chains. Not only will this deliver exponential economic benefits from the projects supported by Government but it will also enable us to tackle increasing global supply chain constraints. Hydrogen UK estimated in its Economic Impact Assessment that hydrogen could deliver 30000 jobs annually and £7bn of GVA by 2030

It is important to be targeted and strategic in our investment and activities and recognise that hydrogen represents a wide range of technologies and the UK should not expect to lead in every area. Hydrogen UK with the support of the Hydrogen Delivery Council has undertaken analysis of the hydrogen value chain building on UK strengths and identifying the high value items that can deliver significant impact and benefit to the UK. We have also conducted widespread engagement with project developers to identify the barriers to utilising UK technology in projects and with technology developers to identify the challenges and barriers to investing and siting development and manufacturing in the UK.

The report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.

Salt caverns have great potential to store relevant amounts of hydrogen as part of the energy transition. However the durability and suitability of commonly used steels for piping in hydrogen salt caverns is still under research. In this work aging effects focusing on corrosion and cracking patterns of casing steel API 5CT J55 and “H2ready” pipeline steel API 5L X56 were investigated with scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy after accelerated stress tests with pressure/temperature cycling under hydrogen salt cavern-like conditions. Compared to dry conditions significant more corrosion by presence of salt ions was detected. However compared to X56 only for J55 an intensification of corrosion and cracking at the surface due to hydrogen atmosphere was revealed. Pronounced surface cracks were observed for J55 over the entire samples. Overall the results strongly suggest that X56 is more resistant than J55 under the conditions of a hydrogen salt cavern.

Hydrogen is one of the key solutions to decarbonising the UK economy along with other carbon abatement solutions such as electrification CCUS biofuels and energy efficiency. It provides a low carbon alternative to fossil fuels that has many of the same desirable features such as burning with a high temperature flame without producing carbon emissions during combustion. Hydrogen will be particularly valuable in hard-to-decarbonise sectors that have few cost-effective alternatives including elements of industry heavy transport and dispatchable power generation. However it’s use could be much more widespread depending on how costs preferences and policy for different low carbon solutions develop. The Government’s Hydrogen Strategy estimates that based on analysis from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) in 2050 between 20% and 35% of the UK’s final energy demand could be met with low carbon hydrogen1 . While hydrogen provides a promising solution to reducing emissions current deployment of low carbon hydrogen is low with almost all hydrogen in the UK produced from unabated fossil fuels resulting in high emissions. In the UK hydrogen production must meet the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard (LCHS) to access government support. This is currently set at 20g CO2 e/MJ(LHV) and will ensure that future deployment will deliver significant emissions reductions when switching from fossil fuels2. The period to 2030 will be a critical time for the UK to seize the economic opportunity presented by low carbon hydrogen sector. Internationally increasing attention has been placed on hydrogen as a solution to global emissions. In the USA the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has provided fixed rate tax credits of up to $3/kg (£2.4/kgII) for clean hydrogen production3. Closer to home the EU is targeting 10 million tonnes of domestic electrolytic production and an additional 10 million tonnes of electrolytic hydrogen imports by 20304. This will be achieved through a variety of policy levers including an auction for fixed price subsidy support for electrolytic production with a ceiling of €4.5/kg5 (£3.84/kgIII). In the UK Government have set an ambitious target of up to 10 GW of low carbon hydrogen production by 2030 with at least half of this from electrolytic sources6. This will be supported by the Hydrogen Production Business Model (HPBM) a two-way variable CfD which could potentially provide hydrogen for a price as low as the natural gas price7 . As global supply chains investment and skills are in international competition the UK must continue its ambitious hydrogen aspirations to ensure the decarbonisation and economic opportunity presented by low carbon hydrogen is captured. This study estimates the economic impact of the low carbon hydrogen sector in the UK by 2030. The impact is assessed by estimating the costs of hydrogen deployment and applying employment and GVA multipliers to these costs based on historic economic activity. These estimates are broken down by different forms of low carbon hydrogen production and end use as well as the enabling infrastructure required to connect production and demand namely hydrogen networks and storage. Both the employment and GVA are estimated for each of these value chain elements for every year between 2024 and 2030. Employment and economic growth from the hydrogen sector will be created across the UK with many benefits arising in regions that have faced historic underinvestment such as the industrial clusters and Scotland. Beyond the high-level economic benefits estimated in this study the hydrogen sector creates an opportunity for the hundreds of thousands oil and gas sector jobs in the UK to transition to a low carbon alternative.

This report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.

The transformation of fossil fuel-based power generation systems towards greenhouse gas-neutral ones based on renewable energy sources is one of the key challenges facing contemporary society. The temporal volatility that accompanies the integration of renewable energy (e.g. solar radiation and wind) must be compensated to ensure that at any given time a sufficient supply of electrical energy for the demands of different sectors is available. Green hydrogen which is produced using renewable energy sources via electrolysis can be used to chemically store electrical energy on a seasonal basis. Reconversion technologies are needed to generate electricity from stored hydrogen during periods of low renewable electricity generation. This study presents a detailed technoeconomic assessment of hydrogen gas turbines. These technologies are also superior to fuel cells due to their comparatively low investment costs especially when it comes to covering the residual loads. As of today hydrogen gas turbines are only available in laboratory or small-scale settings and have no market penetration or high technology readiness level. The primary focus of this study is to analyze the effects on gas turbine component costs when hydrogen is used instead of natural gas. Based on these findings an economic analysis addressing the current state of these turbine components is conducted. A literature review on the subsystems is performed considering statements from leading manufactures and researchers to derive the cost deviations and total cost per installed capacity (€/kWel). The results reveal that a hydrogen gas turbine power plant has an expected cost increase of 8.5% compared to a conventional gas turbine one. This leads to an average cost of 542.5 €/kWel for hydrogen gas turbines. For hydrogen combined cycle power plants the expected cost increase corresponds to the cost of the gas turbine system as the steam turbine subsystem remains unaffected by fuel switching. Additionally power plant retrofit potentials were calculated and the respective costs in the case of an upgrade were estimated. For Germany as a case study for an industrialized country the potential of a possible retrofit is between 2.7 and 11.4 GW resulting to a total investment between 0.3 and 1.1 billion €.

Acting in accordance with the requirements of the 2015 Paris Agreement Poland as well as other European Union countries have committed to achieving climate neutrality by 2050. One of the solutions to reduce emissions of harmful substances into the environment is the implementation of large-scale hydrogen technologies. This article presents the cost of producing green hydrogen produced using an alkaline electrolyzer with electricity supplied from a photovoltaic farm. The analysis was performed using the Monte Carlo method and for baseline assumptions including an electricity price of 0.053 EUR/kWh the cost of producing green hydrogen was 5.321 EUR/kgH2 . In addition this article presents a sensitivity analysis showing the impact of the electricity price before and after the energy crisis and other variables on the cost of green hydrogen production. The large change occurring in electricity prices (from 0.035 EUR/kWh to 0.24 EUR/kWh) significantly affected the levelized cost of green hydrogen (LCOH) which could change by up to 14 EUR/kgH2 in recent years. The results of the analysis showed that the parameters that successively have the greatest impact on the cost of green hydrogen production are the operating time of the plant and the unit capital expenditure. The development of green hydrogen production facilities along with the scaling of technology in the future can reduce the cost of its production.

In the present work we present the results of numerical simulations involving the dispersion and combustion of a hydrogen cloud released in an empty tunnel. The simulations were conducted with the use of ADREA-HF CFD code and the results are compared with measurements from experiments conducted by HSE in a tunnel with the exact same geometry. The length of the tunnel is equal to 70 m and the maximum height from the floor is equal to 3.25 m. Hydrogen release is considered to occur from a train containing pressurized hydrogen stored at 580 bars. The release diameter is equal to 4.7 mm and the release direction is upwards. Initially dispersion simulation was performed in order to define the initial conditions for the deflagration simulations. The effect of the initial wind speed and the effect of the ignition delay time were investigated. An extensive grid sensitivity study was conducted in order to achieve grid independent results. The CFD model takes into account the flame instabilities that are developed as the flame propagates inside the tunnel and turbulence that exists in front of the flame front. Pressure predictions are compared against experimental measurements revealing a very good performance of the CFD model.

A growing share of renewable energy production in the energy supply systems is key to reaching the European political goal of zero CO2 emission in 2050 highlighted in the green deal. Linked to the irregular production of solar and wind energies which have the highest potential for development in Europe massive energy storage solutions are needed as energy buffers. The European project HyPSTER [1] (Hydrogen Pilot STorage for large Ecosystem Replication) granted by the Clean Hydrogen Partnership addresses this topic by demonstrating a cyclic test in an experimental salt cavern filled with hydrogen up to 3 tons using hydrogen that is produced onsite by a 1 MW electrolyser. One specific objective of the project is the assessment of the risks and environmental impacts of cyclic hydrogen storage in salt caverns and providing guidelines for safety regulations and standards. This paper highlights the first outcome of the task WP5.5 of the HyPSTER project addressing the regulatory and normative frameworks for the safety of hydrogen storage in salt caverns from some selected European Countries which is dedicated to defining recommendations for promoting the safe development of this industry within Europe.

Hydrogen refueling stations rely on pressure vessels capable of withstanding pressures up to 90 MPa while mitigating concerns related to hydrogen embrittlement. However a gap exists in understanding the long-term fatigue behavior of these vessels under real operational conditions. This study focuses on evaluating the safety of SA372 pressure vessels using operational data from a hydrogen refueling station in Pyeongtaek South Korea. A predictive reinspection methodology is proposed based on this evaluation. Parameters including hydrogen-induced stress intensity factor (KIH) initial crack size (a0 c0) and pressure vessel specifications are considered to assess critical crack depth (ac) critical usage cycles (Nc) and allowable usage cycles (Nallowed). Leveraging operational data collected between August and November 2023 fatigue analysis and Rainflow counting inform reinspection schedules. Results indicate a need for mid-bank vessel reinspection within the second year high-bank vessel reinspection every 20 years and low-bank vessel reinspection every 143 years in accordance with safety regulations. Additionally a revised refueling logic is proposed to optimize vehicle charging methods and pressure ranges enhancing operational safety. This study serves as a preliminary investigation highlighting the need for broader data collection and analysis to generalize findings across multiple stations.

Hydrogen and carbon capture and storage are pivotal to decarbonize the European energy system in a broad range of pathway scenarios. Yet their timely uptake in different sectors and distribution across countries are affected by supply options of renewable and fossil energy sources. Here we analyze the decarbonization of the European energy system towards 2060 covering the power heat and industry sectors and the change in use of hydrogen and carbon capture and storage in these sectors upon Europe’s decoupling from Russian gas. The results indicate that the use of gas is significantly reduced in the power sector instead being replaced by coal with carbon capture and storage and with a further expansion of renewable generators. Coal coupled with carbon capture and storage is also used in the steel sector as an intermediary step when Russian gas is neglected before being fully decarbonized with hydrogen. Hydrogen production mostly relies on natural gas with carbon capture and storage until natural gas is scarce and costly at which time green hydrogen production increases sharply. The disruption of Russian gas imports has significant consequences on the decarbonization pathways for Europe with local energy sources and carbon capture and storage becoming even more important. Given the highlighted importance of carbon capture and storage in reaching the climate targets it is essential that policymakers ameliorate regulatory challenges related to these value chains.

This paper provides an in-depth examination of critical and strategic raw materials (CRMs) and their crucial role in the development of electrolyzer and fuel cell technologies within the hydrogen economy. It methodically analyses a range of electrolyzer technologies including alkaline proton-exchange membrane solid-oxide anion-exchange membrane and proton-conducting ceramic systems. Each technology is examined for its specific CRM dependencies operational characteristics and the challenges associated with CRM availability and sustainability. The study further extends to hydrogen storage and separation technologies focusing on the materials employed in high-pressure cylinders metal hydrides and hydrogen separation processes and their CRM implications. A key aspect of this paper is its exploration of the supply and demand dynamics of CRMs offering a comprehensive view that encompasses both the present sttate and future projections. The aim is to uncover potential supply risks understand strategies and identify potential bottlenecks for materials involved in electrolyzer and fuel cell technologies addressing both current needs and future demands as well as supply. This approach is essential for the strategic planning and sustainable development of the hydrogen sector emphasizing the importance of CRMs in achieving expanded electrolyzer capacity leading up to 2050.