United Kingdom

The 3D model of conjugate heat transfer from a fire to compressed gas storage cylinder is described. The model predictions of temperature outside and inside the cylinder as well as pressure increase during a fire are compared against a fire test experiment. The simulation reproduced measured in test temperatures and pressures. The original failure criterion of the cylinder in a fire has been applied in the model. This allowed for the prediction of the cylinder catastrophic rupture time with acceptable engineering accuracy. The significance of 3D modelling is demonstrated and recommendations to improve safety of high-pressure composite tanks are given.

Hydrogen Infrastructures are currently being built up to support the initial commercialization of the fuel cell vehicle by multiple automakers. Three primary markets are presently coordinating a large build up of hydrogen stations: Japan; USA; and Europe to support this. Hydrogen Fuelling Station General Safety and Performance Considerations are important to establish before a wide scale infrastructure is established.

This document introduces the ISO Technical Report 19880-1 and summarizes main elements of the proposed standard. Note: this ICHS paper is based on the draft TR 19880 and is subject to change when the document is published in 2015. International Standards Organisation (ISO) Technical Committee (TC) 197 Working Group (WG) 24 has been tasked with the preparation of the ISO standard 19880-1 to define the minimum requirements considered applicable worldwide for the hydrogen and electrical safety of hydrogen stations. This report includes safety considerations for hydrogen station equipment and components control systems and operation. The following systems are covered specifically in the document as shown in Figure 1:

• H2 production / supply delivery system
• Compression
• Gaseous hydrogen buffer storage;
• Pre-cooling device;
• Gaseous hydrogen dispensers.
• Hydrogen Fuelling Vehicle Interface

The draft TR 19880-1 (and current plan for the standard) also gives guidance for the fueling validation with safety considerations relevant to the interaction between the hydrogen station and hydrogen road vehicles (during fuelling).. Through a cross-industry risk assessment carried out between OEMs Hydrogen Suppliers and existing vehicle fuelling station providers & operators (e.g. oil and industrial gas companies) the hydrogen fueling protocol SAE J2601 and associated dispenser hardware was evaluated."

The United Kingdom has a vast scientific base across the entire Hydrogen and Fuel Cell research landscape with a world class academic community coupled with significant industrial activity from both UK-based Hydrogen and Fuel Cell companies and global companies with a strong presence within the country. The Hydrogen and Fuel Cell (H2FC) SUPERGEN Hub funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) was established in 2012 as a five-year programme to bring the UK's H2FC research community together. Here we present the UK's current Hydrogen and Fuel Cell activities along with the role of the H2FC SUPERGEN Hub.

The three years European MATHRYCE project dedicated to material testing and design recommendations for components exposed to hydrogen enhanced fatigue started in October 2012. Its main goal is to provide an “easy” to implement methodology based on lab-scale experimental tests under hydrogen gas to assess the service life of a real scale component taking into account fatigue loading under hydrogen gas. Dedicated experimental tests will be developed for this purpose. In the present paper the proposed approach is presented and compared to the methodologies currently developed elsewhere in the world.

An experimental study of hydrogen/air premixed flame propagation in a closed rectangular channel with the inhibitions (N2 or CO2) was conducted to investigate the inhibiting effect of N2 and CO2 on the flame properties during its propagation. Both Schlieren system and the pressure sensor were used to capture the evolution of flame shape and pressure changes in the channel. It was found that both N2 and CO2 have considerable inhibiting effect on hydrogen/air premixed flames. Compared with N2 CO2 has more prominent inhibition which has been interpreted from thermal and kinetic standpoints. In all the flames the classic tulip shape was observed. With different inhibitor concentration the flame demonstrated three types of deformation after the classic tulip inversion. A simple theoretical analysis has also been conducted to indicate that the pressure wave generated upon the first flame-wall contact can affect the flame deformation depending on its meeting moment with the flame front. Most importantly the meeting moment is always behind the start of tulip inversion which suggests the non-dominant role of pressure wave on this featured phenomenon.

A benchmarking exercise on quantitative risk assessment (QRA) methodologies has been conducted within the project HyQRA under the framework of the European Network of Excellence (NoE) HySafe. The aim of the exercise was basically twofold: (i) to identify the differences and similarities in approaches in a QRA and their results for a hydrogen installation between nine participating partners representing a broad spectrum of background in QRA culture and history and (ii) to identify knowledge gaps in the various steps and parameters underlying the risk quantification. In the first step a reference case was defined: a virtual hydrogen refuelling station (HRS) in virtual surroundings comprising housing school shops and other vulnerable objects. All partners were requested to conduct a QRA according to their usual approach and experience. Basically participants were free to define representative release cases to apply models and frequency assessments according their own methodology and to present risk according to their usual format. To enable inter-comparison a required set of results data was prescribed like distances to specific thermal radiation levels from fires and distances to specific overpressure levels. Moreover complete documentation of assumptions base data and references was to be reported. It was not surprising that a wide range of results was obtained both in the applied approaches as well as in the quantitative outcomes and conclusions. This made it difficult to identify exactly which assumptions and parameters were responsible for the differences in results as the paper will show. A second phase was defined in which the QRA was determined by a more limited number of release cases (scenarios). The partners in the project agreed to assess specific scenarios in order to identify the differences in consequence assessment approaches. The results of this phase provide a better understanding of the influence of modelling assumptions and limitations on the eventual conclusions with regard to risk to on-site people and to the off-site public. This paper presents the results and conclusions of both stages of the exercise.

The possibility of using a risk based approach for the safe installation and siting of stationary fuel cell systems depends upon the availability of normative data and guidance on potential hazards and the probabilities of their occurrence. Such guidance data is readily available for most common hydrocarbon fuels. For hydrogen however data is still required on the hazards associated with different release scenarios. This data can then be related to the probability of different types of scenarios from historical fault data to allow safety distances to be defined and controlled using different techniques. Some data on releases has started to appear but this data generally relates to hydrogen vehicle refuelling systems that are designed for larger throughput higher pressures and the general use of larger pipe diameters than are likely to be used for small fuel cell systems.

This work presents the results of the Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem (SBEP) V20 of Work Package 6 (WP6) of HySafe Network of Excellence (NoE) co-funded by the European Commission in the frame of evaluating the quality and suitability of codes models and user practices by comparative assessments of code results. The benchmark problem SBEP-V20 covers release scenarios that were experimentally investigated in the past using helium as a substitute to hydrogen. The aim of the experimental investigations was to determine the ventilation requirements for parking hydrogen fuelled vehicles in residential garages. Helium was released under the vehicle for 2 h with 7.200 l/h flow rate. The leak rate corresponded to a 20% drop of the peak power of a 50 kW fuel cell vehicle. Three double vent garage door geometries are considered in this numerical investigation. In each case the vents are located at the top and bottom of the garage door. The vents vary only in height. In the first case the height of the vents is 0.063 m in the second 0.241 m and in the third 0.495 m. Four HySafe partners participated in this benchmark. The following CFD packages with the respective models were applied to simulate the experiments: ADREA-HF using k–ɛ model by partner NCSRD FLACS using k–ɛ model by partner DNV FLUENT using k–ɛ model by partner UPM and CFX using laminar and the low-Re number SST model by partner JRC. This study compares the results predicted by the partners to the experimental measurements at four sensor locations inside the garage with an attempt to assess and validate the performance of the different numerical approaches.

Within the scope of the HyResponse project the development of a specialised training programme is currently underway. Utilizing an andragogy approach to teaching distance learning is mixed with classroom instructors-led activities while hands-on training on a full-scale simulator is coupled with an innovative virtual reality based experience. Although the course is dedicated mainly to first responders provision has been made to incorporate not only simple table-top and drill exercises but also full-scale training involving all functional emergency response organisations at multi-agency cooperation level. The developed curriculum includes basics of hydrogen safety first responders' procedures and incident management expectations

Commercial use of hydrogen on-board fuel cell vehicles necessitates the compression of hydrogen gas up to 700 bar raising unique safety challenges. Potential hazards to be addressed include jet fires from high-pressure hydrogen on-board storage. Previous studies investigated effects of jet fires that occur when pressure relief devices (PRDs) on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles activate. This investigation examines plane jets’ axis switching and flame length accounting for compressibility effects and turbulent combustion near the point of release. Comparison with experimental data and previous plane jet simulation results reveal that combustion process does not affect flow dynamics in compressible region of jet flow. Furthermore a theoretical design of a variable aperture pressure relief device is examined which would enable the blow-down time to be minimized while reducing deterministic separation distances is examined using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques. Design recommendations are suggested for a novel PRD design.