United States

Hydrogen sensors are recognized as a critical element in the safety design for any hydrogen system. In this role sensors can perform several important functions including indication of unintended hydrogen releases activation of mitigation strategies to preclude the development of dangerous situations activation of alarm systems and communication to first responders and to initiate system shutdown. The functionality of hydrogen sensors in this capacity is decoupled from the system being monitored thereby providing an independent safety component that is not affected by the system itself. The importance of hydrogen sensors has been recognized by DOE and by the Fuel Cell Technologies Office’s Safety and Codes Standards (SCS) program in particular which has for several years supported hydrogen safety sensor research and development. The SCS hydrogen sensor programs are currently led by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The current SCS sensor program encompasses the full range of issues related to safety sensors including development of advance sensor platforms with exemplary performance development of sensor-related code and standards outreach to stakeholders on the role sensors play in facilitating deployment technology evaluation and support on the proper selection and use of sensors.

The unconfined release of high-pressure hydrogen can create a large flammable jet with the potential to generate significant damage. To properly understand the separation distances necessary to protect the immediate surroundings it is important to accurately assess the potential consequences. In these events the possibility for a detonation cannot be excluded and would generally result in the worst case scenario from the standpoint of damaging overpressure. The strong concentration gradients created by a jet release however raises the question of what portion of the flammable cloud should be considered. Often all of the fuel within the limits of fast-flame acceleration or even all of the fuel within the flammability range is considered which typically comprises the majority of the flammable cloud. In this work prior detonation studies are reviewed to illustrate the inherently unstable nature of detonations with a focus on the critical dimensions and concentration gradients that can support a propagating detonation wave. These criteria are then applied to the flammable cloud concentration distributions generated by an unconfined jet release of hydrogen. By evaluating these limits it is found that the portion of the flammable cloud that is likely to participate is significantly reduced. These results are compared with existing experimental data on the ignition of unconfined hydrogen releases and the peak pressures that were measured are consistent with a detonation of a mass of fuel that is equivalent to the model prediction for the mass of fuel within the detonable limits. This work demonstrates how the critical conditions for detonation propagation can be used to estimate the portion of a hydrogen release that could participates in a detonation and how these criteria can be readily incorporated into existing dispersion modelling approaches.

A key challenge for future clean power or hydrogen projects via gasification is the need to reduce the overall cost while achieving significant levels of CO2 capture. The current state of the art technology for capturing CO2 from sour syngas uses a physical solvent absorption process (acid gas removal–AGR) such as Selexol™ or Rectisol® to selectively separate H2S and CO2 from the H2. These two processes are expensive and require significant utility consumption during operation which only escalates with increasing levels of CO2 capture. Importantly Air Products has developed an alternative option that can achieve a higher level of CO2 capture than the conventional technologies at significantly lower capital and operating costs. Overall the system is expected to reduce the cost of CO2 capture by over 25%.<br/>Air Products developed this novel technology by leveraging years of experience in the design and operation of H2 pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems in its numerous steam methane reformers. Commercial PSAs typically operate on clean syngas and thus need an upstream AGR unit to operate in a gasification process. Air Products recognized that a H2 PSA technology adapted to handle sour feedgas (Sour PSA) would enable a new and enhanced improvement to a gasification system. The complete Air Products CO2 Capture technology (CCT) for sour syngas consists of a Sour PSA unit followed by a low-BTU sour oxycombustion unit and finally a CO2 purification / compression system.

The Hydrogen Safety Codes and Standards program element of the US Department of Energy's Fuel Cell Technologies Office provides coordination and technical data for the development of domestic and international codes and standards related to hydrogen technologies. The materials compatibility program task at Sandia National Laboratories (Livermore CA) is focused on developing the technical basis for qualifying materials for hydrogen service i.e. accommodating hydrogen embrittlement. This presentation summarizes code development activities for qualifying materials for hydrogen service with emphasis on the scientific basis for the testing methodologies including fracture mechanics based measurements (fracture threshold and fatigue crack growth) total fatigue life measurements and full- scale pressure vessel testing.

The Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program Plan (the Program Plan or Plan) outlines the strategic high-level focus areas of DOE’s Hydrogen Program (the Program). The term Hydrogen Program refers not to any single office within DOE but rather to the cohesive and coordinated effort of multiple offices that conduct research development and demonstration (RD&D) activities on hydrogen technologies. This terminology and the coordinated efforts on hydrogen among relevant DOE offices have been in place since 2004 and provide an inclusive and strategic view of how the Department coordinates activities on hydrogen across applications and sectors. This version of the Plan updates and expands upon previous versions including the Hydrogen Posture Plan and the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Plan and provides a coordinated high-level summary of hydrogen related activities across DOE.



The 2006 Hydrogen Posture Plan fulfilled the requirement in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) that the Energy Secretary transmit to Congress a coordinated plan for DOE’s hydrogen and fuel cell activities. For historical context the original Posture Plan issued in 2004 outlined a coordinated plan for DOE and the U.S. Department of Transportation to meet the goals of the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative (HFI) and implement the 2002 National Hydrogen Energy Technology Roadmap. The HFI was launched in 2004 to accelerate research development and demonstration (RD&D) of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for use in transportation electricity generation and portable power applications. The Roadmap provided a blueprint for the public and private efforts required to fulfill a long-term national vision for hydrogen energy as outlined in A National Vision of America’s Transition to a Hydrogen Economy—to 2030 and Beyond. Both the Roadmap and the Vision were developed out of meetings involving DOE industry academia non-profit organizations and other stakeholders. The Roadmap the Vision the Posture Plans the 2011 Program Plan and the results of key stakeholder workshops continue to form the underlying basis for this current edition of the Program Plan.



This edition of the Program Plan reflects the Department’s focus on conducting coordinated RD&D activities to enable the adoption of hydrogen technologies across multiple applications and sectors. It includes content from the various plans and documents developed by individual offices within DOE working on hydrogen-related activities including: the Office of Fossil Energy's Hydrogen Strategy: Enabling a Low Carbon Economy the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-year RD&D Plan the Office of Nuclear Energy’s Integrated Energy Systems 2020 Roadmap and the Office of Science’s Basic Research Needs for the Hydrogen Economy. Many of these documents are also in the process of updates and revisions and will be posted online.



Through this overarching document the reader will gain information on the key RD&D needs to enable the largescale use of hydrogen and related technologies—such as fuel cells and turbines—in the economy and how the Department’s various offices are addressing those needs. The Program will continue to periodically revise the Plan along with all program office RD&D plans to reflect technological progress programmatic changes policy decisions and updates based on stakeholder input and reviews.

Hydrogen Infrastructures are currently being built up to support the initial commercialization of the fuel cell vehicle by multiple automakers. Three primary markets are presently coordinating a large build up of hydrogen stations: Japan; USA; and Europe to support this. Hydrogen Fuelling Station General Safety and Performance Considerations are important to establish before a wide scale infrastructure is established.

This document introduces the ISO Technical Report 19880-1 and summarizes main elements of the proposed standard. Note: this ICHS paper is based on the draft TR 19880 and is subject to change when the document is published in 2015. International Standards Organisation (ISO) Technical Committee (TC) 197 Working Group (WG) 24 has been tasked with the preparation of the ISO standard 19880-1 to define the minimum requirements considered applicable worldwide for the hydrogen and electrical safety of hydrogen stations. This report includes safety considerations for hydrogen station equipment and components control systems and operation. The following systems are covered specifically in the document as shown in Figure 1:

• H2 production / supply delivery system
• Compression
• Gaseous hydrogen buffer storage;
• Pre-cooling device;
• Gaseous hydrogen dispensers.
• Hydrogen Fuelling Vehicle Interface

The draft TR 19880-1 (and current plan for the standard) also gives guidance for the fueling validation with safety considerations relevant to the interaction between the hydrogen station and hydrogen road vehicles (during fuelling).. Through a cross-industry risk assessment carried out between OEMs Hydrogen Suppliers and existing vehicle fuelling station providers & operators (e.g. oil and industrial gas companies) the hydrogen fueling protocol SAE J2601 and associated dispenser hardware was evaluated."

One of the main benefits sought by including hydrogen in the alternative fuels mix is emissions reduction – eventually by 100%. However in the near term there is a very significant cost differential between fossil fuels and hydrogen. Hythane (a blend of hydrogen and natural gas) can act as a viable next step on the path to an ultimate hydrogen economy as a fuel blend consisting of 8−30 % hydrogen in methane can reduce emissions while not requiring significant changes in existing infrastructure. This work seeks to evaluate whether hythane may be safer than both hydrogen and methane under certain conditions. This is due to the fact hythane combines the positive safety properties of hydrogen (strong buoyancy high diffusivity) and methane (much lower flame speeds and narrower flammability limits as compared to hydrogen). For this purpose several different mixture compositions (e.g. 8 % 20 % and 30 % hydrogen) are considered. The evaluation of (a) dispersion characteristics (which are more positive than for methane) (b) combustion characteristics (which are closer to methane than hydrogen) and (c) Combined dispersion + explosion risk is performed. This risk is expected to be comparable to that of pure methane possibly lower in some situations and definitely lower than for pure hydrogen. The work is performed using the CFD software FLACS that has been well-validated for safety studies of both natural gas/methane and hydrogen systems. The first part of the work will involve validating the flame speeds and flammability limits predicted by FLACS against values available in literature. The next part of the work involves validating the overpressures predicted by the CFD tool for combustion of premixed mixtures of methane and hydrogen with air against available experimental data. In the end practical systems such as vehicular tunnels garages etc. is used to demonstrate positive safety benefits of hythane with comparisons to similar simulations for both hydrogen and methane.

Contrary to several reports in the recent literature the use of oxygen sensors for indirectly monitoring ambient hydrogen concentration has serious drawbacks. This method is based on the assumption that a hydrogen release will displace oxygen which is quantified using oxygen sensors. Despite its shortcomings the draft Hydrogen Vehicle Global Technical Regulation lists this method as a means to monitor hydrogen leaks to verify vehicle fuel system integrity. Experimental evaluations that were designed to impartially compare the ability of commercial oxygen and hydrogen sensors to reliably measure and report hydrogen concentration changes are presented. Numerous drawbacks are identified and discussed.

This paper introduces the 3D risk management (3DRM) concept with particular emphasis on hydrogen installations (Hy3DRM). The 3DRM framework entails an integrated solution for risk management that combines a detailed site-specific 3D geometry model a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool for simulating flow-related accident scenarios methodology for frequency analysis and quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and state-of-the-art visualization techniques for risk communication and decision support. In order to reduce calculation time and to cover escalating accident scenarios involving structural collapse and projectiles the CFD-based consequence analysis can be complemented with empirical engineering models reduced order models or finite element analysis (FEA). The paper outlines the background for 3DRM and presents a proof-of-concept risk assessment for a hypothetical hydrogen filling station. The prototype focuses on dispersion fire and explosion scenarios resulting from loss of containment of gaseous hydrogen. The approach adopted here combines consequence assessments obtained with the CFD tool FLACS-Hydrogen from Gexcon and event frequencies estimated with the Hydrogen Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM) tool from Sandia to generate 3D risk contours for explosion pressure and radiation loads. For a given population density and set of harm criteria it is straightforward to extend the analysis to include personnel risk as well as risk-based design such as detector optimization. The discussion outlines main challenges and inherent limitations of the 3DRM concept as well as prospects for further development towards a fully integrated framework for risk management in organizations.

RCS for hydrogen technologies were first developed approximately sixty years ago when hydrogen was being sold as an industrial commodity. The advent of new hydrogen technologies such as Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) created a need for new RCS. These RCS have been developed with extensive support from the US DOE. These new hydrogen technologies are approaching commercial deployment and this process will produce information on RCS field performance that will create more robust RCS.

Safety is of paramount importance in all facets of the research development demonstration and deployment work of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Program. The Safety Codes and Standards sub-program (SC&S) facilitates deployment and commercialization of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies by developing and disseminating information and knowledge resources for their safe use. A comprehensive safety management program utilizing the Hydrogen Safety Panel to raise safety consciousness at the project level and developing/disseminating a suite of safety knowledge resources is playing an integral role in DOE and SC&S efforts. This paper provides examples of accomplishments achieved while reaching a growing and diverse set of stakeholders involved in research development and demonstration; design and manufacturing; deployment and operations. The work of the Hydrogen Safety Panel highlights new knowledge and the insights gained through interaction with project teams. Various means of collaboration to enhance the value of the program’s safety knowledge tools and training resources are illustrated and the direction of future initiatives to reinforce the commitment to safety is discussed.

As of 2014 the majority of the Codes and Standards required to initially deploy hydrogen technologies infrastructure in the US have been promulgated1. These codes and standards will be field tested through their application to actual hydrogen technologies projects. CCSI is process of identifying code issues that arise during project deployment and then develop codes solutions to these issues. These solutions would typically be proposed amendments to codes and standards. The process is continuous because of technology and the state of safety knowledge develops there will be a need for monitoring the application of codes and standards and improving them based on information gathered during their application. This paper will discuss code issues that have surfaced through hydrogen technologies infrastructure project deployment and potential code changes that would address these issues. The issues that this paper will address include:

• Setback distances for bulk hydrogen storage
• Code mandated hazard analyses
• Sensor placement and communication
• The use of approved equipment
• System monitoring and maintenance requirements

There exists an international commitment to increase the utilization of hydrogen as a clean and renewable alternative to carbon-based fuels. The availability of hydrogen safety sensors is critical to assure the safe deployment of hydrogen systems. Already the use of hydrogen safety sensors is required for the indoor fueling of fuel cell powered forklifts (e.g. NFPA 52 Vehicular Fuel Systems Code [1]). Additional Codes and Standards specific to hydrogen detectors are being developed [2 3] which when adopted will impose mandatory analytical performance metrics. There are a large number of commercially available hydrogen safety sensors. Because end-users have a broad range of sensor options for their specific applications the final selection of an appropriate sensor technology can be complicated. Facility engineers and other end-users are expected to select the optimal sensor technology choice. However some sensor technologies may not be a good fit for a given application. Informed decisions require an understanding of the general analytical performance specifications that can be expected by a given sensor technology. Although there are a large number of commercial sensors most can be classified into relatively few specific sensor types (e.g. electrochemical metal oxide catalytic bead and others). Performance metrics of commercial sensors produced on a specific platform may vary between manufacturers but to a significant degree a specific platform has characteristic analytical trends advantages and limitations. Knowledge of these trends facilitates the selection of the optimal technology for a specific application (i.e. indoor vs. outdoor environments). An understanding of the various sensor options and their general analytical performance specifications would be invaluable in guiding the selection of the most appropriate technology for the designated application.

The development of a set of safety codes and standards for hydrogen facilities is necessary to ensure they are designed and operated safely. To help ensure that a hydrogen facility meets an acceptable level of risk code and standard development organizations (SDOs) are utilizing risk-informed concepts in developing hydrogen codes and standards. Two SDOs the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) through its Technical Committee (TC) 197 on hydrogen technologies have been developing standards for gaseous hydrogen facilities that specify the facilities have certain safety features use equipment made of material suitable for a hydrogen environment and have specified separation distances. Under Department of Energy funding Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) has been supporting efforts by both of these SDOs to develop the separation distances included in their respective standards. Important goals in these efforts are to use a defensible science-based approach to establish these requirements and to the extent possible harmonize the requirements. International harmonization of regulations codes and standards is critical for enabling global market penetration of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.

Experience makes a superior teacher. Sharing the details surrounding safety events is one of the best ways to help prevent their recurrence elsewhere. This approach requires an open non-punitive environment to achieve broad benefits. The Hydrogen Incident Reporting Tool (www.h2incidents.org) is intended to facilitate the sharing of lessons learned and other relevant information gained from actual experiences using and working with hydrogen and hydrogen systems. Its intended audience includes those involved in virtually any aspect of hydrogen technology systems and use with an emphasis towards energy and transportation applications. The database contains records of safety events both publicly available and/or voluntarily submitted. Typical records contain a general description of the occurrence contributing factors equipment involved and some detailing of consequences and changes that have been subsequently implemented to prevent recurrence of similar events in the future. The voluntary and confidential nature and other characteristics surrounding the database mean that any analysis of apparent trends in its contents cannot be considered statistically valid for a universal population. A large portion of reported incidents have occurred in a laboratory setting due to the typical background of the reporting projects for example. Yet some interesting trends are becoming apparent even at this early stage of the database’s existence and general lessons can already be taken away from these experiences. This paper discusses the database and a few trends that have already become apparent for the reported incidents. Anticipated future uses of this information are also described. This paper is intended to encourage wider participation and usage of the incidents reporting database and to promote the safety benefits offered by its contents.

As hydrogen fuel cell vehicles become more widely adopted by consumers the demand for refuelling stations increases. Most vehicles require high-pressure (either 350 or 700 bar) hydrogen and therefore the refuelling infrastructure must support these pressures. Fast running reduced order physical models of releases from high-pressure sources are needed so that quantitative risk assessment can guide the safety certification of these stations. A release from a high pressure source is choked at the release point forming the complex shock structures of an under-expanded jet before achieving a characteristic Gaussian pro le for velocity density mass fraction etc. downstream. Rather than using significant computational resources to resolve the shock structure an equivalent source model can be used to quickly and accurately describe the ow in terms of velocity diameter and thermodynamic state after the shock structure. In this work we present correlations for the equivalent boundary conditions of a subsonic jet as a high-pressure jet downstream of the shock structure. Schlieren images of under-expanded jets are used to show that the geometrical structure of under-expanded jets scale with the square root of the static to ambient pressure ratio. Correlations for an equivalent source model are given and these parameters are also found to scale with square root of the pressure ratio. We present our model as well as planar laser Rayleigh scattering validation data for static pressures up to 60 bar.

In this paper we present a detailed design study of a novel apparatus for safely generating hydrogen (H2) on demand according to a novel method using a controlled chemical reaction between water (H2O) and sodium (Na) metal that yields hydrogen gas of sufficient purity for direct use in fuel cells without risk of contaminating sensitive catalysts. The apparatus consists of a first pressure vessel filled with liquid H2O with an overpressure of nitrogen (N2) gas above the H2O reactant and a second pressure vessel that stores solid Na reactant. Hydrogen gas is generated above the solid Na when H2O reactant is introduced using a regulator that senses when the downstream pressure of H2 gas above the solid Na reactant has dropped below a threshold value. The sodium hydroxide (NaOH) byproduct of the hydrogen producing reaction is collected within the apparatus for later reprocessing by electrolysis to recover the Na reactant.

Envisioned below is an energy system named Thermal Hydrogen developed to enable economy-wide decarbonization. Thermal Hydrogen is an energy system where electric and/or heat energy is used to split water (or CO₂) for the utilization of both by-products: hydrogen as energy storage and pure oxygen as carbon abatement. Important advantages of chemical energy carriers are long term energy storage and extended range for electric vehicles. These minimize the need for the most capital intensive assets of a fully decarbonized energy economy: low carbon power plants and batteries. The pure oxygen pre-empts the gas separation process of “Carbon Capture and Sequestration” (CCS) and enables hydrocarbons to use simpler more efficient thermodynamic cycles. Thus the “externality” of water splitting pure oxygen is increasingly competitive hydrocarbons which happen to be emissions free. Methods for engineering economy-wide decarbonization are described below as well as the energy supply carrier and distribution options offered by the system.

In close cooperation with their Canadian counterparts United States public safety authorities are taking the first steps towards creating a proper infrastructure to ensure the safe use of the new hydrogen fuel cells now being introduced commercially. Currently public safety officials are being asked to permit hydrogen fuel cells for stationary power and as emergency power backups for the telecommunications towers that exist everywhere. Consistent application of the safety codes is difficult – in part because it is new – yet it is far more complex to train emergency responders to deal safely with the inevitable hydrogen incidents. The US and Canadian building and fire codes and standards are similar but not identical. The US and Canadian rules are unlikely to be useful to other nations without modification to suit different regulatory systems. However emergency responder safety training is potentially more universal. The risks strategies and tactics are unlikely to differ much by region. The Hydrogen Executive Leadership Panel (HELP) made emergency responder safety training its first priority because the transition to hydrogen depends on keeping incidents small and inoffensive and the public and responders safe from harm. One might think that advising 1.2 million firefighters and 800000 law enforcement officers about hydrogen risks is no more complicated than adding guidance to a website. One would be wrong. The term “training” has specific legal implications which may vary by state. For hazardous materials federal requirements apply. Insurance companies place training requirements on the policies they sell to fire departments including the thousands of small all-volunteer departments which may operate as private corporations. Union contracts may define training and promotions may be based on satisfactorily completed certain levels of training. Emergency responders could no sooner learn how to extinguish a<br/>hydrogen fire by reading a webpage than a person could learn to ride a bicycle by reading a book. Procedures must be learned by listening reading and then doing. Regular practice is necessary. As new hydrogen applications are commercialized additional responder training may be necessary. This highlights another obstacle emergency responders’ ability to travel distances and take the time to undergo training. Historically fire academies established adjunct instructor programs and satellite academies to bring the training to firefighters. The large well-equipped academies are typically used for specialized training. States rarely have enough instructors and instructors often must take the time to create a course outline research each point and produce a program that is informative useful and holds the attention of responders. The challenge of training emergency responders seems next to impossible but public safety authorities are asked to tackle the impossible every day and a model exists to move forward in the U.S. Over the past few years the National Association of State Fire Marshals and U.S. Department of Transportation enlisted the help of emergency responders and industry to create a standardized approach to train emergency responders to deal with pipeline incidents. A curriculum and training materials were created and more than 26000 sets have been distributed for free to public safety agencies nationwide. More than 8000 instructors have been trained to use these materials that are now part of the regular training in 23 states. Using this model HELP intends to ensure that all emergency responders are trained to address hydrogen risks. The model and the rigorous scenario analysis and review used to developing the operational and technical training is addressed in this paper.

The University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR) through a hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicle evaluation participation agreement with the Ford Motor Company will establish a commuter bus service and hydrogen refueling at a station in rural Missouri near Ft. Leonard Wood (FLW). Initiated by a request from the U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center at FLW UMR is leading the effort to launch the commuter service between FLW and the neighboring towns of Rolla and Lebanon Missouri each of which are located approximately 40 km from the military base on Interstate-44 highway. The broad research training and education agenda for the rural hydrogen transportation test bed is to develop demonstrate evaluate and promote safe hydrogen-based technologies in a real world environment. With funds provided by the Defense Logistics Agency through the Air Force Research Laboratory this hydrogen initiative will build and operate a hydrogen fueling facility that includes on-site generation of hydrogen through electrolysis as well as selling a range of other traditional and alternative fuels.

In any application involving the production storage or use of hydrogen sensors are important devices for alerting to the presence of leaked hydrogen. Hydrogen sensors should be accurate sensitive and specific as well as resistant to long term drift and varying environmental conditions. Furthermore as an integral element in a safety system sensor performance should not be compromised by operational parameters. For example safety sensors may be required to operate at reduced oxygen levels relative to air. In this work we evaluate and compare a number of sensor technologies in terms of their ability to detect hydrogen under conditions of varying oxygen concentration.

A properly trained first responder community is critical to the successful introduction of hydrogen fuel cell applications and their transformation in how we use energy. Providing resources with accurate information and current knowledge is essential to the delivery of effective hydrogen and fuel cell-related first responder training. The California Fuel Cell Partnership and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have over 15 years of experience in developing and delivering hydrogen safety-related first responder training materials and programs. A National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Emergency Response Training Resource was recently released. This training resource serves the delivery of a variety of training regimens. Associated materials are adaptable for different training formats ranging from high-level overview presentations to more comprehensive classroom training. This paper presents what has been learned from the development and delivery of hydrogen safety-related first responder training programs (online classroom hands-on) by the respective organizations. The collaborative strategy being developed for enhancing training materials and methods for greater accessibility based on stakeholder input will be discussed.

Due to rapid growth in the use of hydrogen powered fuel cell forklifts within warehouse enclosures Sandia National Laboratories has worked to develop scientific methods that support the creation of new hydrogen safety codes and standards for indoor refuelling operations. Based on industry stakeholder input conducted experiments were devised to assess the utility of modelling approaches used to analyze potential consequences from ignited hydrogen leaks in facilities certified according to existing code language. Release dispersion and combustion characteristics were measured within a scaled test facility located at SRI International's Corral Hollow Test Site. Moreover the impact of mitigation measures such as active/passive ventilation and pressure relief panels was investigated. Since it is impractical to experimentally evaluate all possible facility configurations and accident scenarios careful characterization of the experimental boundary conditions has been performed so that collected datasets can be used to validate computational modelling approaches.

Sandia National Laboratories has worked with stakeholders and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to develop scientific data that can be used to create risk-informed hydrogen codes and standards for the safe operation of indoor hydrogen fuel-cell forklifts. An important issue is the possibility of an accident inside a warehouse or other enclosed space where a release of hydrogen from the high-pressure gaseous storage tank could occur. For such scenarios computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been used to model the release and dispersion of gaseous hydrogen from the vehicle and to study the behavior of the ignitable hydrogen cloud inside the warehouse or enclosure. The overpressure arising as a result of ignition and subsequent deflagration of the hydrogen cloud within the warehouse has been studied for different ignition delay times and ignition locations. Both ventilated and unventilated warehouses have been considered in the analysis. Experiments have been performed in a scaled warehouse test facility and compared with simulations to validate the results of the computational analysis.

Performing research in the interest of providing relevant safety requirements is a valuable and essential endeavor but translating research results into enforceable requirements adopted into codes and standards a process sometimes referred to as codification can be a separate and challenging task. This paper discusses the process utilized to successfully translate research results related to bulk gaseous hydrogen storage separation (or stand-off) distances into code requirements in NFPA 55:Storage Use and Handling of Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids in Portable and StationaryContainers Cylinders and Tanks and NFPA 2: Hydrogen Technologies. The process utilized can besummarized as follows: First the technical committees for the documents to be revised were engaged to confirm that the codification process was endorsed by the committee. Then a sub-committee referred to as a task group was formed. A chair must be elected or appointed. The chair should be a generalist with code enforcement or application experience. The task group was populated with several voting members of each technical committee. By having voting members as part of the task group the group becomes empowered and uniquely different from any other code proposal generating body. The task group was also populated with technical experts as needed but primarily the experts needed are the researchers involved. Once properly populated and empowered the task group must actively engage its members. The researchers must educate the code makers on the methods and limitations of their work and the code makers must take the research results and fill the gaps as needed to build consensus and create enforceable code language and generate a code change proposal that will be accepted. While this process seems simple there are pitfalls along the way that can impede or nullify the desired end result – changes to codes and standards. A few of these pitfalls include: wrong task group membership task group not empowered task group not supported in-person meetings not possible consensus not achieved. This paper focuses on the process used and how pitfalls can be avoided for future efforts.

Experiments were conducted to assess detectability of a low-level leak of hydrogen gas and the uniformity of hydrogen concentration at selected sensor placement locations in a realistic setting. A 5%2hydrogen/95%2nitrogen gas mixture was injected at a rate of 350 L/min for about 3/4 hour into a 93m3 residential garage space through a 0.09 m2 square open-top dispersion box located on the floor. Calibrated catalytic sensors were placed on ceiling and wall locations and the sensors detected hydrogen early in the release and continued to measure concentrations to peak and diminishing levels. Experiments were conducted with and without a car parked over the dispersion box. The results show that a car positioned over the dispersion box tends to promote dilution of the hydrogen cause a longer time for locations to reach a fixed threshold and produce lower peak concentrations than with no car present.

The Department of Energy the Department of Defense's Defense Logistics Agency and the Department of Transportation's Federal Transit Administration have funded learning demonstrations and early market deployments to provide insight into applications of hydrogen technologies on the road in the warehouse and as stationary power. NREL's analyses validate the technology in real-world applications reveal the status of the technology and facilitate the development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies manufacturing and operations. This paper presents the maintenance safety and operation data of fuel cells in multiple applications with the reported incidents near misses and frequencies. NREL has analyzed records of more than 225000 kilograms of hydrogen that have been dispensed through more than 108000 hydrogen fills with an excellent safety record.

There are times in engineering when it seems that safety and equipment cost reduction are conflicting priorities. This could be the case for pressure relief valves and vent stack sizing. This paper explores the role that component availability (particularly variety in flow and orifice diameters) plays in the engineer’s decision of a relief valve. This paper outlines the guidelines and assumptions in sizing and selecting pressure relief devices (PRDs) found in a typical high pressure hydrogen fueling station. It also provides steps in sizing the station common vent stack where the discharge gas is to be routed to prior being released into the atmosphere. This paper also explores the component availability landscape for hydrogen station designers and identifies opportunities for improvement in the supply chain of components as hydrogen fueling stations increase in number and size. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII (ASME BPVC Section VIII) Compressed Gas Association S-1.3 (CGA S-1.3) and American Petroleum Institute 520 (API 520) standards provide specific design criteria for hydrogen pressure relief valves. Results of these calculations do not match the available components. The available safety relief valves are 50 to 87 times larger than the required calculated flow capacities. Selecting a significantly oversized safety relief valve affects the vent stack design as the stack design requires sizing relative to the actual flowrate of the safety relief valve. The effect on the vent stack size in turn negatively affects site safety radiation threshold set back distances.

The Hydrogen Safety Panel brings a broad cross-section of expertise from the industrial government and academic sectors to help advise the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office through its work in hydrogen safety codes and standards. The Panel's initiatives in reviewing safety plans conducting safety evaluations identifying safety-related technical data gaps and supporting safety knowledge tools and databases cover the gamut from research and development to demonstration. The Panel's recent work has focused on the safe deployment of hydrogen and fuel cell systems in support of DOE efforts to accelerate fuel cell commercialization in early market applications: vehicle refuelling material handling equipment backup power for warehouses and telecommunication sites and portable power devices. This paper summarizes the work and learnings from the Panel's early efforts the transition to its current focus and the outcomes and conclusions from recent work on the deployment of hydrogen and fuel cell systems.

We are going to focus our discussion on “Explosions” its definitions from a scientific regulatory and societal perspective. We will point out that as defined these definitions are not consistent and lead to ambiguity. Of particular interest to this work is how this current ambiguity affects the emerging Regulation Codes and Standards (RCS) as applied to hydrogen technologies. While this manuscript has its roots in combustion science with extension to both the standard development and regulatory communities for hazards at large the unique behavior of hydrogen in many configurations motivates examining the relevant definitions and language used in these communities. We will point out the ambiguities how this leads to confusion in supporting definitions and how it leads to overly restrictive RCS for hydrogen applications. We will then suggest terminology which is not ambiguous internally self-consistent and allows appropriate RCS to be promulgated to ensure the safety of the public and capital to ensure the correct response of first responders and allow cost effective development of hydrogen technologies in our infrastructure.

Element One Inc. Boulder CO is developing novel hydrogen gas leak indicators to improve the safety and maintenance operations of hydrogen production and chemical processing facilities and hydrogen fueling stations. These technologies can be used to make visual gas leak indicators such as paints decals and conformal plastic films as well as RF sensors for wireless networks. The primary advantage of the Element One hydrogen gas indicators is their low cost and easy deployment which allows them to be used ubiquitously at each and every potential hydrogen leak site. They have the potential to convert safety problems into routine maintenance problems thereby improving overall safety and decreasing operational costs.

In the United States requirements for liquid motor vehicle fuelling stations have been in place for many years. Requirements for motor vehicle fuelling stations for gaseous fuels including hydrogen are relatively new. These requirements have in the United States been developed along different code and standards paths. The liquid fuels have been addressed in a single document and the gaseous fuels have been addressed in documents specific to an individual gas. The result of these parallel processes is that multi-fuel stations are subject to requirements in several fuelling regulations codes and standards (RCS). This paper describes a configuration of a multi-fuel motor vehicle fuelling station and provides a detailed breakdown of the codes and standards requirements. The multi-fuel station would dispense what the U.S. Department of Energy defines as the six key alternative fuels: biodiesel electricity ethanol hydrogen natural gas and propane. The paper will also identify any apparent gaps in RCS and potential research projects that could help fill these gaps.

The hydrogen economy has received resurging interest in recent years as more countries commit to net-zero CO₂ emissions around the mid-century. “Blue” hydrogen from natural gas with CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) is one promising sustainable hydrogen supply option. Although conventional CO₂ capture imposes a large energy penalty advanced process concepts using the chemical looping principle can produce blue hydrogen at efficiencies even exceeding the conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) process without CCS. One such configuration is gas switching reforming (GSR) which uses a Ni-based oxygen carrier material to catalyze the SMR reaction and efficiently supply the required process heat by combusting an off-gas fuel with integrated CO₂ capture. The present study investigates the potential of advanced La-Fe-based oxygen carrier materials to further increase this advantage using a gas switching partial oxidation (GSPOX) process. These materials can overcome the equilibrium limitations facing conventional catalytic SMR and achieve direct hydrogen production using a water-splitting reaction. Results showed that the GSPOX process can achieve mild efficiency improvements relative to GSR in the range of 0.6–4.1%-points with the upper bound only achievable by large power and H₂ co-production plants employing a highly efficient power cycle. These performance gains and the avoidance of toxicity challenges posed by Ni-based oxygen carriers create a solid case for the further development of these advanced materials. If successful results from this work indicate that GSPOX blue hydrogen plants can outperform an SMR benchmark with conventional CO₂ capture by more than 10%-points both in terms of efficiency and CO₂ avoidance.

Interest in the low-cost production of clean hydrogen is growing. Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) are considered one of the most promising sustainable hydrogen production technologies because of their ability to split water using platinum group metal-free catalysts less expensive anode flow fields and bipolar plates. Critical to the realization of AEMWEs is understanding the durability-limiting factors that restrict the long-term use of these devices. This article presents both durability-limiting factors and mitigation strategies for AEMWEs under three operation modes i.e. pure water-fed (no liquid electrolyte) concentrated KOH-fed and 1 wt% K₂CO₃-fed operating at a differential pressure of 100 psi. We examine extended-term behaviors of AEMWEs at the single-cell level and connect their behavior with the electrochemical chemical and mechanical instability of single-cell components. Finally we discuss the pros and cons of AEMWEs under these operation modes and provide direction for long-lasting AEMWEs with highly efficient hydrogen production capabilities.

About 400 million tonnes of plastics are produced per annum worldwide. End-of-life of plastics disposal contaminates the waterways aquifers and limits the landfill areas. Options for recycling plastic wastes include feedstock recycling mechanical /material recycling industrial energy recovery municipal solid waste incineration. Incineration of plastics containing E-Wastes releases noxious odours harmful gases dioxins HBr polybrominated diphenylethers and other hydrocarbons. This study focusses on recycling options in particular feedstock recycling of plastics in high-temperature materials processing for a sustainable solution to the plastic wastes not suitable for recycling. Of the 7% CO₂ emissions attributed to the iron and steel industry worldwide ∼30% of the carbon footprint is reduced using the waste plastics compared to other carbon sources in addition to energy savings. Plastics have higher H₂ content than the coal. Hydrogen evolved from the plastics acts as the reductant alongside the carbon monoxide. Hydrogen reduction of iron ore in presence of plastics increases the reaction rates due to higher diffusion of H₂ compared to CO. Plastic replacement reduces the process temperature by at least 100–200 °C due to the reducing gases (hydrogen) which enhance the energy efficiency of the process. Similarly plastics greatly reduce the emissions in other high carbon footprint process such as magnesia production while contributing to energy.

A better understanding of chemical kinetics under volumetric expansion is important for a number of situations relevant to industrial safety including detonation diffraction and direct initiation reflected shock-ignition at obstacles ignition behind a decaying shock among others. The ignition of stoichiometric hydrogen-air mixtures was studied using 0D numerical simulations with time-dependent specific volume variations. The competition between chemical energy release and expansion-induced cooling was characterized for different cooling rates and mathematical forms describing the shock decay rate. The critical conditions for reaction quenching were systematically determined and the thermo-chemistry dynamics were analyzed near the critical conditions.

Hydrogen (H₂) is one of the best candidates to replace current petroleum energy resources due to its rich abundance and clean combustion. However the storage of H₂presents a major challenge. There are two methods for storing H₂ fuel chemical and physical both of which have some advantages and disadvantages. In physical storage highly porous organic polymers are of particular interest since they are low cost easy to scale up metal-free and environmentally friendly.

In this review highly porous polymers for H₂ fuel storage are examined from five perspectives:

(a) brief comparison of H₂ storage in highly porous polymers and other storage media;

(b) theoretical considerations of the physical storage of H₂ molecules in porous polymers;

(c) H₂ storage in different classes of highly porous organic polymers;

(d) characterization of microporosity in these polymers; and

(e) future developments for highly porous organic polymers for H₂ fuel storage. These topics will provide an introductory overview of highly porous organic polymers in H₂ fuel storage.

A new assessment tool for evaluating decarbonization technologies that considers each technology’s sustainability security affordability readiness and impact for a specific country is proposed. This tool is applied to a set of decarbonization technologies for the power transport and industry sectors for the ten Southeast Asian countries that constitute ASEAN. This results in a list of the most promising decarbonization technologies as well as the remaining issues that need more research and development. This study reveals several common themes for ASEAN’s decarbonization. First carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key technology for large-scale CO2 emission. Second for countries that rely heavily on coal for power generation switching to gas can halve their CO2 emission in the power sector and should be given high priority. Third hydropower and bioenergy both have high potential for the majority of ASEAN countries if their sustainability issues can be resolved satisfactorily. Fourth replacing conventional vehicles by electric vehicles is the overarching theme in the road transport sector but will result in increased demand for electricity. In the medium to long term the use of hydrogen for marine fuel and biofuels for aviation fuel are preferred solutions for the marine and aviation transport sectors. Fifth for the industry sector installing CCS in industrial plants should be given priority but replacing fossil fuels by blue hydrogen for high-temperature heating is the preferred long-term solution.

To meet the needs of public and private stakeholders involved in the development construction and operation of hydrogen fuelling stations needed to support the widespread roll-out of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles this work presents publicly available station templates and analyses. These ‘Reference Stations’ help reduce the cost and speed the deployment of hydrogen stations by providing a common baseline with which to start a design enable quick assessment of potential sites for a hydrogen station identify contributors to poor economics and suggest areas of research. This work presents layouts bills of materials piping and instrumentation diagrams and detailed analyses of five new station designs. In the near term delivered hydrogen results in a lower cost of hydrogen compared to on-site production via steam methane reforming or electrolysis although the on-site production methods have other advantages. Modular station concepts including on-site production can reduce lot sizes from conventional assemble-on-site stations.

Large-scale deflagration and detonation experiments of hydrogen and air mixtures provide fundamental data needed to address accident scenarios and to help in the evaluation and validation of numerical models. Several different experiments of this type were performed. Measurements included flame front time of arrival (TOA) using ionization probes blast pressure heat flux high-speed video standard video and infrared video. The large-scale open-space tests used a hemispherical 300-m3 facility that confined the mixture within a thin plastic tent that was cut prior to initiating a deflagration. Initial homogeneous hydrogen concentrations varied from 15% to 30%. An array of large cylindrical obstacles was placed within the mixture for some experiments to explore turbulent enhancement of the combustion. All tests were ignited at the bottom center of the facility using either a spark or in one case a small quantity of high explosive to generate a detonation. Spark-initiated deflagration tests were performed within the tunnel using homogeneous hydrogen mixtures. Several experiments were performed in which 0.1 kg and 2.2 kg of hydrogen were released into the tunnel with and without ventilation. For some tunnel tests obstacles representing vehicles were used to investigate turbulent enhancement. A test was performed to investigate any enhancement of the deflagration due to partial confinement produced by a narrow gap between aluminium plates. The attenuation of a blast wave was investigated using a 4-m-tall protective blast wall. Finally a large-scale hydrogen jet experiment was performed in which 27 kg of hydrogen was released vertically into the open atmosphere in a period of about 30 seconds. The hydrogen plume spontaneously ignited early in the release.

The development and promulgation of codes and standards are essential to establish a market-receptive environment for commercial hydrogen-based products and systems. The focus of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to conduct the research and development (R&D) needed to strengthen the scientific basis for technical requirements incorporated in national and international standards codes and regulations. In the U.S. the DOE and its industry partners have formed a Codes and Standards Tech Team (CSTT) to help guide the R&D. The CSTT has adopted an R&D Roadmap to achieve a substantial and verified database of the properties and behaviour of hydrogen and the performance characteristics of emerging hydrogen technology applications sufficient to enable the development of effective codes and standards for these applications. However to develop a more structured approach to the R&D described above the CSTT conducted a workshop on Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Codes and Standards in March 2005. The purpose of the workshop was to attain a consensus among invited experts on the protocols and data needed to address the development of risk-informed standards codes and regulations for hydrogen used as an energy carrier by consumers. Participants at the workshop identified and assessed requirements methodologies and applicability of risk assessment (RA) tools to develop a framework to conduct RA activities to address for example hydrogen fuel distribution delivery on-site storage and dispensing and hydrogen vehicle servicing and parking. The CSTT was particularly interested in obtaining the advice of RA experts and representatives of standards and model code developing organizations and industry on how data generated by R&D can be turned into information that is suitable for hydrogen codes and standards development. The paper reports on the results of the workshop and the RA activities that the DOE’s program on hydrogen safety codes and standards will undertake. These RA activities will help structure a comprehensive R&D effort that the DOE and its industry partners are undertaking to obtain the data and conduct the analysis and testing needed to establish a scientific and technical basis for hydrogen standards codes and regulations.

A combined experimental and modeling program is being carried out at Sandia National Laboratories to characterize and predict the behavior of unintended hydrogen releases. In the case where the hydrogen leak remains unignited knowledge of the concentration field and flammability envelope is an issue of importance in determining consequence distances for the safe use of hydrogen. In the case where a high-pressure leak of hydrogen is ignited a classic turbulent jet flame forms. Knowledge of the flame length and thermal radiation heat flux distribution is important to safety. Depending on the effective diameter of the leak and the tank source pressure free jet flames can be extensive in length and pose significant radiation and impingement hazard resulting in consequence distances that are unacceptably large. One possible mitigation strategy to potentially reduce the exposure to jet flames is to incorporate barriers around hydrogen storage equipment. The reasoning is that walls will reduce the extent of unacceptable consequences due to jet releases resulting from accidents involving high-pressure equipment. While reducing the jet extent the walls may introduce other hazards if not configured properly. The goal of this work is to provide guidance on configuration and placement of these walls to minimize overall hazards using a quantitative risk assessment approach. Detailed Navier-Stokes calculations of jet flames and unignited jets are used to understand how hydrogen leaks and jet-flames interact with barriers. The effort is complemented by an experimental program that considers the interaction of jet flames and unignited jets with barriers.

A simple approximate method for evaluation of blast effects and safety distances for unconfined hydrogen explosions is presented. The method includes models for flame speeds hydrogen distribution blast parameters and blast damage criteria. An example of the application of this methodology for hydrogen releases in three hypothetical obstructed areas with different levels of congestion is presented. The severity of the blast effect of unconfined hydrogen explosions is shown to depend strongly on the level of congestion for relatively small releases. Extremely large releases of hydrogen are predicted to be less sensitive to the congestion level.

A total of 12 ventilation experiments with various combinations of hydrogen release rates and ventilation speeds were performed in order to study how ventilation speed and release rate effect the hydrogen concentration in a closed system. The experiential facility was constructed out of steel plates and beams in the shape of a rectangular enclosure. The volume of the test facility was about 60m3. The front face of the enclosure was covered by a plastic film in order to allow visible and infrared cameras to capture images of the flame. The inlet and outlet vents were located on the lower front face and the upper backside panel respectively. Hydrogen gas was released toward the ceiling from the center of the floor. The hydrogen gas was released at constant rate in each test. The hydrogen release rate ranged from 0.002 m3/s to 0.02 m3/s. Ventilation speeds were 0.1 0.2 and 0.4 m3/s respectively. Ignition was attempted at the end of the hydrogen release by using multiple continuous spark ignition modules on the ceiling and next to the release point. Time evolution of hydrogen concentration was measured using evacuated sample bottles. Overpressure and impulse inside and outside the facility were also measured. The mixture was ignited by a spark ignition module mounted on the ceiling in eight of eleven tests. In the other three tests the mixture was ignited by spark ignition modules mounted next to the nozzle. Overpressures generated by the hydrogen deflagration in most of these tests were low and represented a small risk to people or property. The primary risk associated with the hydrogen deflagrations studied in these tests was from the fire. The maximum concentration is proportional to the ratio of the hydrogen release rate to the ventilation speed within the range of parameters tested. Therefore a required ventilation speed can be estimated from the assumed hydrogen leak rate within the experimental conditions described in this paper.

We have modelled sudden hydrogen expansion from a cryogenic pressure vessel. This model considers real gas equations of state single and two-phase flow and the specific “vessel within vessel” geometry of cryogenic vessels. The model can solve sudden hydrogen expansion for initial pressures up to 1210 bar and for initial temperatures ranging from 27 to 400 K. For practical reasons our study focuses on hydrogen release from 345 bar with temperatures between 62 K and 300 K. The pressure vessel internal volume is 151 L. The results indicate that cryogenic pressure vessels may offer a safety advantage with respect to compressed hydrogen vessels because i) the vacuum jacket protects the pressure vessel from environmental damage ii) hydrogen when released discharges first into an intermediate chamber before reaching the outside environment and iii) working temperature is typically much lower and thus the hydrogen has less energy. Results indicate that key expansion parameters such as pressure rate of energy release and thrust are all considerably lower for a cryogenic vessel within vessel geometry as compared to ambient temperature compressed gas vessels. Future work will focus on taking advantage of these favourable conditions to attempt fail-safe cryogenic vessel designs that do not harm people or property even after catastrophic failure of the inner pressure vessel.

Solid state materials such as metal and chemical hydrides have been proposed and developed for high energy density automotive hydrogen storage applications. As these materials are implemented into hydrogen storage systems developers must understand their behavior during accident scenarios or contaminated refueling events. An ability to predict thermal and chemical processes during contamination allows for the design of safe and effective hydrogen storage systems along with the development of appropriate codes and standards. A model for the transport of gases within an arbitrary-geometry reactive metal hydride bed (alane -AlH3) is presented in this paper. We have coupled appropriate Knudsen-regime permeability models for flow through packed beds with the fundamental heat transfer and chemical kinetic processes occurring at the particle level. Using experimental measurement to determine and validate model parameters we have developed a robust numerical model that can be utilized to predict processes in arbitrary scaled-up geometries during scenarios such as breach-in-tank or contaminated refueling. Results are presented that indicate the progression of a reaction front through a compacted alane bed as a result of a leaky fitting. The rate of this progression can be limited by; 1) restricting the flow of reactants into the bed through densification and 2) maximizing the rate of heat removal from the bed.

The properties of hydrogen compared to conventional fuels such as gasoline and diesel are substantially different requiring adaptations to the design and layout of test cells for hydrogen fuelled engines and vehicles. A comparison of hydrogen fuel properties versus conventional fuels in this paper provides identification of requirements that need to be adapted to design a safe test cell. Design examples of actual test cells are provided to showcase the differences in overall layout and ventilation safety features fuel supply and metering and emissions measurements. Details include requirements for ventilation patterns the necessity for engine fume hoods as well as hydrogen specific intake and exhaust design. The unique properties of hydrogen in particular the wide flammability limits and nonvisible flames also require additional safety features such as hydrogen sensors and flame cameras. A properly designed and implemented fuel supply system adds to the safety of the test cell by minimizing the amount of hydrogen that can be released. Apart from this the properties of hydrogen also require different fuel consumption measurement systems pressure levels of the fuel supply system additional ventilation lines strategically placed safety solenoids combined with appropriate operational procedures. The emissions measurement for hydrogen application has to be expanded to include the amount of unburned hydrogen in the exhaust as a measurement of completeness of combustion. This measurement can also be used as a safety feature to avoid creation of ignitable hydrogen-air mixtures in the engine exhaust. The considerations provided in this paper lead to the conclusion that hydrogen IC engines can be safely tested however properly designed test cell and safety features have to be included to mitigate the additional hazards related to the change in fuel characteristics.

For large-scale distribution and use of energy carriers classified as hazardous material in many countries as a method to assist land use planning to grant licenses to design a safe installation and to operate it safely some form of risk analysis and assessment is applied. Despite many years of experience the methods have still their weaknesses even the most elaborated ones as e.g. shown by the large spread in results when different teams perform an analysis on a same plant as was done in EU projects. Because a fuel as hydrogen with its different properties will come new in the daily use of many people incidents may happen and risks will be discussed. HySafe and other groups take good preparatory action in this respect and work in the right direction as appears from various documents produced. However already a superficial examination of the results so far tells that further cooperative work is indispensable. To avoid criticism skepticism and frustration not only the positive findings should be described and general features of the methods but the community has also to give strong guidance with regard to the uncertainties. Scenario development appears to be very dependent on insight and experience of an individual analyst leak and ignition probability may vary over a wide range of values Computational Fluid Dynamics or CFD models may lead to very different result. The Standard Benchmark Exercise Problems SBEPs are a good start but shall produce guidelines or recommendations for CFD use or even perhaps certification of models. Where feasible narrowing of possible details of scenarios to the more probable ones taking into account historical incident data and schematizing in bowties more explicit use of confidence intervals on e.g. failure rates and ignition probability estimates will help. Further knowledge gaps should be defined.

Hydrogen is recognized as the “future fuel” and the most promising alternative of fossil fuels due to its remarkable properties including exceptionally high energy content per unit mass (142 MJ/kg) low mass density and massive environmental and economical upsides. A wide spectrum of methods in H₂ production especially carbon-free approaches H2purification and H2storage have been investigated to bring this energy source closer to the technological deployment. Hydrogen hydrates are among the most intriguing material paradigms for H₂storage due to their appealing properties such as low energy consumption for charge and discharge safety cost-effectiveness and favorable environmental features. Here we comprehensively discuss the progress in understanding of hydrogen clathrate hydrates with an emphasis on charging/discharging rate of H₂ (i.e. hydrate formation and dissociation rates) and the storage capacity. A thorough understanding on phase equilibrium of the hydrates and its variation through different materials is provided. The path toward ambient temperature and pressure hydrogen batteries with high storage capacity is elucidated. We suggest that the charging rate of H₂ in this storage medium and long cyclic performance are more immediate challenges than storage capacity for technological translation of this storage medium. This review and provided outlook establish a groundwork for further innovation on hydrogen hydrate systems for promising future of hydrogen fuel.

Automotive proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have finally reached a state of technological readiness where several major automotive companies are commercially leasing and selling fuel cell electric vehicles including Toyota Honda and Hyundai. These now claim vehicle speed and acceleration refueling time driving range and durability that rival conventional internal combustion engines and in most cases outperform battery electric vehicles. The residual challenges and areas of improvement which remain for PEMFCs are performance at high current density durability and cost. These are expected to be resolved over the coming decade while hydrogen infrastructure needs to become widely available. Here we briefly discuss the status of automotive PEMFCs misconceptions about the barriers that platinum usage creates and the remaining hurdles for the technology to become broadly accepted and implemented.