Canada

The permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations varies from country to country. However a common step in the permitting process is the demonstration that the proposed fueling station meets certain safety requirements. Currently many permitting authorities rely on compliance with well known codes and standards as a means to permit a facility. Current codes and standards for hydrogen facilities require certain safety features specify equipment made of material suitable for hydrogen environment and include separation or safety distances. Thus compliance with the code and standard requirements is widely accepted as evidence of a safe design. However to ensure that a hydrogen facility is indeed safe the code and standard requirements should be identified using a risk-informed process that utilizes an acceptable level of risk. When compliance with one or more code or standard requirements is not possible an evaluation of the risk associated with the exemptions to the requirements should be understood and conveyed to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Establishment of a consistent risk assessment toolset and associated data is essential to performing these risk evaluations. This paper describes an approach for risk-informing the permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations that relies primarily on the establishment of risk-informed codes and standards. The proposed risk-informed process begins with the establishment of acceptable risk criteria associated with the operation of hydrogen fueling stations. Using accepted Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) techniques and the established risk criteria the minimum code and standard requirements necessary to ensure the safe operation of hydrogen facilities can be identified. Risk informed permitting processes exist in some countries and are being developed in others. To facilitate consistent risk-informed approaches the participants in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 19 on hydrogen safety are working to identify acceptable risk criteria QRA models and supporting data.

Compressed hydrogen storage is currently widely used in fuel cell vehicles due to its simplicity in tank structure and refuelling process. For safety reason the final gas temperature in the hydrogen tank during vehicle refuelling must be maintained under a certain limit e.g. 85 °C. Many experiments have been performed to find the relations between the final gas temperature in the hydrogen tank and refueling conditions. The analytical solution of the hydrogen temperature in the tank can be obtained from the simplified thermodynamic model of a compressed hydrogen storage tank and it serves as function formula to fit experimental temperatures. From the analytical solution the final hydrogen temperature can be expressed as a weighted average form of initial temperature inflow temperature and ambient temperature inspired by the rule of mixtures. The weighted factors are related to other refuelling parameters such as initial mass initial pressure refuelling time refuelling mass rate average pressure ramp rate (APRR) final mass final pressure etc. The function formula coming from the analytical solution of the thermodynamic model is more meaningful physically and more efficient mathematically in fitting experimental temperatures. The simple uniform formula inspired by the concept of the rule of mixture and its weighted factors obtained from the analytical solution of lumped parameter thermodynamics model is representatively used to fit the experimental and simulated results in publication. Estimation of final hydrogen temperature from refuelling parameters based on the rule of mixtures is simple and practical for controlling the maximum temperature and for ensuring hydrogen safety during fast filling process.

In close cooperation with their Canadian counterparts United States public safety authorities are taking the first steps towards creating a proper infrastructure to ensure the safe use of the new hydrogen fuel cells now being introduced commercially. Currently public safety officials are being asked to permit hydrogen fuel cells for stationary power and as emergency power backups for the telecommunications towers that exist everywhere. Consistent application of the safety codes is difficult – in part because it is new – yet it is far more complex to train emergency responders to deal safely with the inevitable hydrogen incidents. The US and Canadian building and fire codes and standards are similar but not identical. The US and Canadian rules are unlikely to be useful to other nations without modification to suit different regulatory systems. However emergency responder safety training is potentially more universal. The risks strategies and tactics are unlikely to differ much by region. The Hydrogen Executive Leadership Panel (HELP) made emergency responder safety training its first priority because the transition to hydrogen depends on keeping incidents small and inoffensive and the public and responders safe from harm. One might think that advising 1.2 million firefighters and 800000 law enforcement officers about hydrogen risks is no more complicated than adding guidance to a website. One would be wrong. The term “training” has specific legal implications which may vary by state. For hazardous materials federal requirements apply. Insurance companies place training requirements on the policies they sell to fire departments including the thousands of small all-volunteer departments which may operate as private corporations. Union contracts may define training and promotions may be based on satisfactorily completed certain levels of training. Emergency responders could no sooner learn how to extinguish a<br/>hydrogen fire by reading a webpage than a person could learn to ride a bicycle by reading a book. Procedures must be learned by listening reading and then doing. Regular practice is necessary. As new hydrogen applications are commercialized additional responder training may be necessary. This highlights another obstacle emergency responders’ ability to travel distances and take the time to undergo training. Historically fire academies established adjunct instructor programs and satellite academies to bring the training to firefighters. The large well-equipped academies are typically used for specialized training. States rarely have enough instructors and instructors often must take the time to create a course outline research each point and produce a program that is informative useful and holds the attention of responders. The challenge of training emergency responders seems next to impossible but public safety authorities are asked to tackle the impossible every day and a model exists to move forward in the U.S. Over the past few years the National Association of State Fire Marshals and U.S. Department of Transportation enlisted the help of emergency responders and industry to create a standardized approach to train emergency responders to deal with pipeline incidents. A curriculum and training materials were created and more than 26000 sets have been distributed for free to public safety agencies nationwide. More than 8000 instructors have been trained to use these materials that are now part of the regular training in 23 states. Using this model HELP intends to ensure that all emergency responders are trained to address hydrogen risks. The model and the rigorous scenario analysis and review used to developing the operational and technical training is addressed in this paper.

Computational fluid dynamics is used to simulate the release of high pressure Hydrogen from a reservoir with an exit of increasing diameter. Abel-Noble real gas equation of state is used to accurately simulate this high pressure release. Parallel processing based on Message Passing Interface for domain decomposition is employed to decrease the solution time. The release exit boundary is increased in time to simulate a scenario when the exit area increases during the release. All nodes and elements are moved accordingly at each time step to maintain the quality of the mesh. Different speeds of increasing diameter are investigated to see the impact on this unsteady flow.

An accident modelling approach is used to assess the safety of a hydrogen station as part of a ground transportation network. The method incorporates prevention barriers associated to human factors management and organizational failures in a risk assessment framework. Failure probabilities of these barriers and end-states events are predicted using Fault Tree Analysis and Event Tree Analysis respectively. Results from the case study considered revealed the capability of the proposed method in estimating the likelihood of various outcomes as well as predicting the future probability. In addition the scheme offers opportunity to provide dynamic adjustment by updating the failure probability with actual plant data. Results from the analysis can be used to plan maintenance and management of change as required by the plant condition.

The effect of vertical surface on the extent of high pressure unignited jets of both hydrogen and methane is studied using computer fluid dynamics simulations performed with FLACS Hydrogen. Results for constant flow rate through a 6.35 mm round leak orifice from 100 barg 250 barg 400 barg 550 barg and 700 barg compressed gas systems are presented for vertical jets. To quantify the effect of the surface on the jet the jet exit is positioned at various distances from the surface ranging from 0.029 m to 12 m. Free jets simulations are performed for comparison purposes.

CFD simulations investigating the effect of ventilation airflow on hydrogen release behaviour in an underground mining tunnel were performed using FLACS hydrogen. Both dispersion and combustion scenarios of a hydrogen release coming from a severed distribution pipeline were investigated. Effects on the hydrogen dispersion such as ventilation strength and the mechanism of air flow supply (a pull or push fan) and mine opening surface roughness surface cavities and obstructions were explored. Results showing the effect of changing the position of the leak adding a cavity on the ceiling of the tunnel and changing the roughness of the walls are given. Overpressure sensitivity to the ignition delay was also considered. From the results for the varied ventilation regimes and spatial scenarios it is difficult to identify the optimal ventilation strategy giving the safest conditions for hydrogen distribution and refuelling in an underground mine.

We have implemented a portable large-scale shadowgraph system for use in flow visualization relating to hydrogen safety. Previous large-scale shadowgraph and schlieren implementations have often been limited to background- oriented techniques which are subject to noise. The system built is based on a large-scale shadowgraph technique developed by Settles which allows for high-quality visualization. We have applied the shadowgraph system to complex phenomena and current issues in hydrogen safety including DDT in long channels jet releases and unconfined deflagrations. Shadowgrams taken are compared to a Z-schlieren system. This shadowgraph system allows analysis of these phenomena at longer length scales.

Power-to-gas is a promising option for storing interment renewables nuclear baseload power and distributed energy and it is a novel concept for the transition to increased renewable content of current fuels with an ultimate goal of transition to a sustainable low-carbon future energy system that interconnects power transportation sectors and thermal energy demand all together. The aim of this paper is to introduce different Power-to-gas “pathways” including Power to Hydrogen Power to Natural Gas End-users Power to Renewable Content in Petroleum Fuel Power to Power Seasonal Energy Storage to Electricity Power to Zero Emission Transportation Power to Seasonal Storage for Transportation Power to Micro grid Power to Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) to Pipeline (“Methanation”) and Power to Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) to Seasonal Storage. In order to compare the different pathways the review of key technologies of Power-to-gas systems are studied and the qualitative efficiency and benefits of each pathway is investigated from the technical points of view. Moreover different Power-to-gas pathways are discussed as an energy policy option that can be implemented to transition towards a lower carbon economy for Ontario’s energy systems

This brief explores recent momentum on hydrogen and evaluates potential implications for subsidies for fossil fuel-based hydrogen given the government's commitments on fossil fuel subsidies.

Spending on hydrogen has the potential to significantly influence the direction taken by the world’s energy systems. In December 2020 Canada unveiled a national hydrogen strategy following the announcement of a strengthened climate plan. The strategy emphasized both blue and green hydrogen. As the government considers whether to provide subsidies for hydrogen we recommend government:

• Ensure that any subsidies for hydrogen are in line with the government’s commitments to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 and meet net-zero by 2050.
• Thoroughly evaluate the potential efficiency of subsidies for hydrogen against robust social environmental and economic criteria. • Improve transparency by publicly reporting on direct spending and tax expenditures for hydrogen production.
• Follow international best practices being set by Canada’s peers. For example Germany and Spain have laid out hydrogen strategies prioritizing green hydrogen.

Based on IISD's analysis subsidies for hydrogen based on natural gas without significant levels of carbon capture and storage (CCS) should not be eligible for government assistance. Subsidies for blue hydrogen should only occur if blue hydrogen can meet the same level of environmental performance (including emission intensity) and is at or below the cost of green hydrogen.

This brief is one of three International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) policy briefs in its Recovery Through Reform series which assesses how efforts to achieve a green recovery from COVID-19 in Canada rely on—and can contribute to—fossil fuel subsidy reform.