Skip to content
1900

Simulation of DDT in Obstructed Channels: Wavy Channels vs. Fence-type Obstacles

Abstract

The capabilities of an OpenFOAM solver to reproduce the transition of stoichiometric H2-air mixtures to detonation in obstructed 2-D channels were tested. The process is challenging numerically as it involves the ignition of a flame kernel, its subsequent propagation and acceleration, interaction with obstacles, formation of shock waves ahead and detonation onset (DO). Two different obstacle configurations were considered in 10-mm high × 1-m long channels: (i) wavy walls (WW) that mimic the behavior of fencetype obstacles but prevent abrupt area changes. In this case, flame acceleration (FA) is strongly affected by shock-flame interactions, and DO often results from the compression of the gas present between the accelerating flame front and a converging section of the channel. (ii) Fence-type (FT) obstacles. In this case, FA is driven by the increase in flame surface area as a result of the interaction of the flame front with the unburned gas flow field ahead, particularly, downstream of obstacles; shock-flame interactions play a role at the later stages of FA, and DO takes place upon reflection of precursor shocks from obstacles. The effect of initial pressure, p0 = 25, 50 and 100 kPa, at constant blockage ratio (BR = 0.6) was investigated and compared for both configurations. Results show that for the same initial pressure (p0 = 50 kPa), the obstacle configurations could lead to different final propagation regimes: a quasi-detonation for WW, and a choked-flame for FT, due to the increased losses for the latter. At p0 = 25 kPa however, while both configurations result in choked flames, WW seem to exhibit larger velocity deficits than FT due to longer flame-precursor shock distances during quasi-steady propagation and to the increased presence of unburnt mixture downstream of the tip of the flame that homogeneously explodes providing additional support to the propagation of the flame.

Funding source: "This work was supported by the French government program “Investissements d’Avenir” (EUR INTREE, reference ANR-18-EURE-0010) through a research internship given to the lead author of this paper."
Related subjects: Safety
Countries: France ; Italy ; Netherlands
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/conference5914
2023-09-21
2024-09-16
/content/conference5914
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error