Skip to content
1900

Long-term Integrated Assessment of the Water, GHG, and Cost Impacts of a Transition to Low-carbon Hydrogen Production: A Case Study for Canada

Abstract

Hydrogen-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation strategies can have multi-sector benefits and are considered necessary to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Assessments of hydrogen scale-up have not included long-term implications for water resources. This work aims to fill this knowledge gap through a long-term integrated assessment of the water consumption, GHG emissions, and costs of conventional and low-carbon hydrogen scenarios to the year 2050. A framework was developed and 120 long-term scenarios were assessed for the large-scale deployment of low-carbon hydrogen in a hydrogen-intensive economy. This study considered 15 different natural gas- and electrolysis-based hydrogen production technologies. A case study for Alberta, a western Canadian province and a fossil fuel-intensive region, was carried out. The results obtained project a cumulative mitigation of 9 to 162 million tonnes of carbon emissions between 2026 and 2050 through the implementation of low-carbon hydrogen production scenarios compared to the business-as-usual scenario. However, cumulative water consumption increases considerably with the large-scale deployment of low-carbon hydrogen, reaching 8 to 3,815 million cubic meters. The adoption of green hydrogen technologies increases water consumption significantly. Depending on the jurisdiction of analysis and its water bodies, this increase may or may not be a long-term issue. Low-carbon hydrogen scenarios start becoming cost-effective as the carbon price rises to $170/tCO2e. The developed integrated framework can be used globally to assess long-term hydrogen implementation with appropriate adjustments in data.

Funding source: The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the NSERC Alliance Grant Program on Integrated Assessment of Energy Systems and the Cenovus Energy Endowed Chair Program in Environmental Engineering for funding the research project. The authors are grateful to representatives from Cenovus Energy Inc., Suncor Energy Inc., Alberta Innovates, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), Alberta Energy and Minerals (AEM), and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for their inputs and comments during the course of this study. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program. This funding was provided in support of the Canada Research Chair in Assessment of Energy Systems (Tier-1). This research was partially supported by funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) as part of the University of Alberta’s Future Energy Systems (FES) research initiative. The authors thank Ms. Astrid Blodgett for editing this paper.
Related subjects: Production & Supply Chain
Countries: Canada
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal6735
2025-01-12
2025-04-07
/content/journal6735
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error