Skip to content
1900

Steam Reforming of Biomass Gasification Gas for Hydrogen Production: From Thermodynamic Analysis to Experimental Validation

Abstract

Biomass gasification produces syngas composed mainly of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, water, and higher hydrocarbons, till C4, mainly ethane. The hydrocarbon content can be upgraded into richer hydrogen streams through the steam reforming reaction. This study assessed the steam reforming process at the thermodynamic equilibrium of five streams, with different compositions, from the gasification of three different biomass sources (Lignin, Miscanthus, and Eucalyptus). The simulations were performed on Aspen Plus V12 software using the Gibbs energy minimization method. The influence of the operating conditions on the hydrogen yield was assessed: temperature in the range of 200 to 1100 ◦C, pressures of 1 to 20 bar, and steamto‑carbon (S/C) molar ratios from 0 (only dry reforming) to 10. It was observed that operating conditions of 725 to 850 ◦C, 1 bar, and an S/C ratio of 3 enhanced the streams’ hydrogen content and led to nearly complete hydrocarbon conversion (>99%). Regarding hydrogen purity, the stream obtained from the gasification of Lignin and followed by a conditioning phase (stream 5) has the highest hydrogen purity, 52.7%, and an hydrogen yield of 48.7%. In contrast, the stream obtained from the gasification of Lignin without any conditioning (stream 1) led to the greatest increase in hydrogen purity, from 19% to 51.2% and a hydrogen yield of 61.8%. Concerning coke formation, it can be mitigated for S/C molar ratios and temperatures >2 and 700 ◦C, respectively. Experimental tests with stream 1 were carried out, which show a similar trend to the simulation results, particularly at high temperatures (700–800 ◦C).

Funding source: This research was supported by Move2LowC project (POCI-01-0247- FEDER-046117), cofinanced by Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizaçao ˜ (POCI), Programa Operacional Regional de Lis boa, Portugal 2020 and the European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). This work was financially sup ported by LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE), UIDB/00511/2020 and UIDP/ 00511/2020 (LEPABE), UIDB/50020/2020 and UIDP/50020/2020 (LSRE-LCM), funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC). M. A. Soria also thanks the FCT for the financial support of his work contract through the Scientific Employment Support Program (Norma Transitoria ´ DL 57/2017).
Related subjects: Production & Supply Chain
Countries: Portugal
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal6432
2023-06-08
2024-12-22
/content/journal6432
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error