Norway

Detailed heat exchanger designs are determined by matching intermediate temperatures in a large-scale Claude refrigeration process for liquefaction of hydrogen with a capacity of 125 tons/day. A comparison is made of catalyst filled plate-fin and spiral-wound heat exchangers by use of a flexible and robust modelling framework for multi-stream heat exchangers that incorporates conversion of ortho-to para-hydrogen in the hydrogen feed stream accurate thermophysical models and a distributed resolution of all streams and wall temperatures. Maps of the local exergy destruction in the heat exchangers are presented which enable the identification of several avenues to improve their performances.<br/>The heat exchanger duties vary between 1 and 31 MW and their second law energy efficiencies vary between 72.3% and 96.6%. Due to geometrical constraints imposed by the heat exchanger manufacturers it is necessary to employ between one to four parallel plate-fin heat exchanger modules while it is possible to use single modules in series for the spiral-wound heat exchangers. Due to the lower surface density and heat transfer coefficients in the spiral-wound heat exchangers their weights are 2–14 times higher than those of the plate-fin heat exchangers.<br/>In the first heat exchanger hydrogen feed gas is cooled from ambient temperature to about 120 K by use of a single mixed refrigerant cycle. Here most of the exergy destruction occurs when the high-pressure mixed refrigerant enters the single-phase regime. A dual mixed refrigerant or a cascade process holds the potential to remove a large part of this exergy destruction and improve the efficiency. In many of the heat exchangers uneven local exergy destruction reveals a potential for further optimization of geometrical parameters in combination with process parameters and constraints.<br/>The framework presented makes it possible to compare different sources of exergy destruction on equal terms and enables a qualified specification on the maximum allowed pressure drops in the streams. The mole fraction of para-hydrogen is significantly closer to the equilibrium composition through the entire process for the spiral-wound heat exchangers due to the longer residence time. This reduces the exergy destruction from the conversion of ortho-hydrogen and results in a higher outlet mole fraction of para-hydrogen from the process.<br/>Because of the higher surface densities of the plate-fin heat exchangers they are the preferred technology for hydrogen liquefaction unless a higher conversion to heat exchange ratio is desired.

Magnesium hydride owns the largest share of publications on solid materials for hydrogen storage. The “Magnesium group” of international experts contributing to IEA Task 32 “Hydrogen Based Energy Storage” recently published two review papers presenting the activities of the group focused on magnesium hydride based materials and on Mg based compounds for hydrogen and energy storage. This review article not only overviews the latest activities on both fundamental aspects of Mg-based hydrides and their applications but also presents a historic overview on the topic and outlines projected future developments. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and experimental studies of Mg-H system at extreme pressures kinetics and thermodynamics of the systems based on MgH₂ nanostructuring new Mg-based compounds and novel composites and catalysis in the Mg based H storage systems. Finally thermal energy storage and upscaled H storage systems accommodating MgH₂ are presented.

In the summer of 1985 a severe hydrogen-air explosion occurred in an ammonia plant in Norway. The accident resulted in two fatalities and the destruction of the building where the explosion took place. This paper presents the main findings from an investigation in 1985 and 1986 of the gas explosion and its consequences. The event started when a gasket in a water pump was blown out. The water pump was situated inside a 100 m long 10 m wide and 7 m high building. The pump was feeding water to a vessel containing hydrogen gas at pressure of 30 bars. This pressure caused a back flow of water flow through the pump and out through the failed gasket. The hydrogen reached the leakage point after about 3 minutes. The discharge of gas lasted some 20 to 30 seconds before the explosion occurred. The total mass of the hydrogen discharge was estimated at 10 to 20 kg hydrogen. The main explosion was very violent and it is likely that the gas cloud detonated. The ignition source was almost certainly a hot bearing. Several damage indicators were used to estimate the amount of hydrogen that exploded. The indicators include deflection of pipes and panels distances traveled by fragments and the distribution of glass breakage. We found that 3.5 to 7 kg of hydrogen must have been burning violently in the explosion. Window glass was broken up to 700 m from the centre of the explosion. Concrete blocks originally part of the north wall of the building and weighing 1.2 metric tons were thrown up to 16 meters. The roof of the building was lifted by an estimated 1.5 meters before resettling. The displacement of the roof caused a guillotine break of a 350 mm diameter pipe connected to the vessel that was the source of the original gas discharge. The gas composition in the vessel was 65 - 95 % hydrogen. This resulted in a large horizontal jet fire lasting about 30 seconds. Minor explosions occurred in the plant culvert system.<br/><br/>To our knowledge this gas explosion is one of the largest industrial hydrogen explosions reported. We believe this case history is a valuable reference for those who are investigating the nature of accidental<br/>hydrogen explosions.

Flame acceleration and deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) is simulated with a numerical code based on a flux limiter centred method for hyperbolic differential equations. The energy source term is calculated by a Riemann solver for the in homogeneous Euler equations for the turbulent combustion and a two-step reaction model for hydrogen-air. The transport equations are filtered for large eddy simulation (LES) and the sub filter turbulence is modelled by a transport equation for the the turbulent kinetic energy. The flame tracking is handled by the G-equation for turbulent flames. Numerical results are compared to pressure histories from physical experiments. These experiments are performed in a closed circular 4m long tube with inner diameter of 0.107m. The tube is filled with hydrogen-air mixture at 1atm which is at rest when ignited. The ignition is located at one end of the tube. The tube is fitted with an obstruction with circular opening 1m down the tube from the ignition point. The obstruction has a blockage ratio of 0.92 and a thickness of 0.01m. The obstruction creates high pressures in the ignition end of the tube and very high gas velocities in and behind the obstruction opening. The flame experiences a detonation to deflagration transition (DDT) in the super sonic jet created by the obstruction. Pressure build-up in the ignition end of the tube is simulated with some discrepancies. The DDT in the supersonic jet is simulated but the position of the DDT is strongly dependent on the simulated pressure in the ignition end.

In order to facilitate the introduction of a new technology as it is the utilization of hydrogen as an energy carrier development of safety codes and standards besides the conduction of demonstrative projects becomes a very important action to be realized. Useful tools of work could be the existing gaseous fuel codes (natural gas and propane) regulating the stationary and automotive applications. Some safety codes have been updated to include hydrogen but they have been based on criteria and/or data applicable for large industrial facilities making the realization of public hydrogen infrastructures prohibitive in terms of space. In order to solve the above mentioned problems others questions come out: how these safety distances have been defined? Which hazard events have been taken as reference for calculation? Is it possible to reduce the safety distances through an appropriate design of systems and components or through the predisposition of adequate mitigation measures? This paper presents an analysis of the definitions of “safety distances” and “hazardous locations” as well as a synoptic analysis of the different values in force in several States for hydrogen and natural gas. The above mentioned synoptic table will highlight the lacks and so some fields that need to be investigated in order to produce a suitable hydrogen standard.

This paper presents a compilation and discussion of the results supplied by HySafe partners participating in the Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem (SBEP) V1 which is based on an experiment on hydrogen release mixing and distribution inside a vessel. Each partner has his own point of view of the problem and uses a different approach to the solution. The main characteristics of the models employed for the calculations are compared. The comparison between results together with the experimental data when available is made. Relative deviations of each model from the experimental values are also included. Explanations and interpretations of the results are presented together with some useful conclusions for future work.

For decades risk assessment has been an important tool in risk management of activities in several industries world wide. It provides among others authorities and stakeholders with a sound basis for creating awareness about existing and potential hazards and risks and making decisions related to how they can prioritise and plan expenditures on risk reduction. The overall goal of the ongoing HySafe project is to contribute to the safe transition to a more sustainable development in Europe by facilitating the safe introduction of hydrogen technologies and applications. An essential element in this is the demonstration of safety: that all safety aspects related to production transportation and public use are controlled to avoid that introducing hydrogen as energy carrier should pose unacceptable risk to the society.<br/>History has proven that introducing risk analysis to new industries is beneficial e.g. in transportation and power production and distribution. However this will require existing methods and standards to be adapted to the specific applications. Furthermore when trying to quantify risk it is of utmost importance to have access to relevant accident and incident information. Such data may in many cases not be readily available and the utilisation of them will then require specific and long lasting data collection initiatives.<br/>In this paper we will present the work that has been undertaken in the HySafe project in developing methodologies and collecting data for risk management of hydrogen infrastructure. Focus is laid on the development of risk acceptance criteria and on the demonstration of safety and benefits to the public. A trustworthy demonstration of safety will have to be based on facts especially on facts widely known and emphasis will thus be put on the efforts taken to establish and operate a database containing hydrogen accident and incident information which can be utilised in risk assessment of hydrogen applications. A demonstration of safety will also have to include a demonstration of risk control measures and the paper will also present work carried out on safety distances and ignition source control.

The future of hydrogen energy is wrapped up with the future of natural gas renewable energy and carbon capture and storage (CCS). This yields useful synergies but also political economic and technical complexity. Nevertheless our survey of more than 1000 senior oil and gas professionals suggests a more certain future for hydrogen and that the time is right to begin scaling the hydrogen economy.

When introducing hydrogen-fuelled vehicles an evaluation of the potential change in risk level should be performed. It is widely accepted that outdoor accidental releases of hydrogen from single vehicles will disperse quickly and not lead to any significant explosion hazard. The situation may be different for more confined situations such as parking garages workshops or tunnels. Experiments and computer modelling are both important for understanding the situation better. This paper reports a simulation study to examine what if any is the explosion risk associated with hydrogen vehicles in tunnels. Its aim was to further our understanding of the phenomena surrounding hydrogen releases and combustion inside road tunnels and furthermore to demonstrate how a risk assessment methodology developed for the offshore industry could be applied to the current task. This work is contributing to the EU Sixth Framework (Network of Excellence) project HySafe aiding the overall understanding that is also being collected from previous studies new experiments and other modelling activities. Releases from hydrogen cars (containing 700 bar gas tanks releasing either upwards or downwards or liquid hydrogen tanks releasing only upwards) and buses (containing 350 bar gas tanks releasing upwards) for two different tunnel layouts and a range of longitudinal ventilation conditions have been studied. The largest release modelled was 20 kg H2 from four cylinders in a bus (via one vent) in 50 seconds with an initial release rate around 1000 g/s. Comparisons with natural gas (CNG) fuelled vehicles have also been performed. The study suggests that for hydrogen vehicles a typical worst-case risk assessment approach assuming the full gas inventory being mixed homogeneously at stoichiometry could lead to severe explosion loads. However a more extensive study with more realistic release scenarios reduced the predicted hazard significantly. The flammable gas cloud sizes were still large for some of the scenarios but if the actual reactivity of the predicted clouds is taken into account very moderate worst-case explosion pressures are predicted. As a final step of the risk assessment approach a probabilistic QRA study is performed in which probabilities are assigned to different scenarios time dependent ignition modelling is applied and equivalent stoichiometric gas clouds are used to translate reactivity of dispersed nonhomogeneous clouds. The probabilistic risk assessment study is based on over 200 dispersion and explosion CFD calculations using the commercially available tool FLACS. The risk assessment suggested a maximum likely pressure level of 0.1-0.3 barg at the pressure sensors that were used in the study. Somewhat higher pressures are seen elsewhere due to reflections (e.g. under the vehicles). Several other interesting observations were found in the study. For example the study suggests that for hydrogen releases the level of longitudinal tunnel ventilation has only a marginal impact on the predicted risk since the momentum of the releases and buoyancy of hydrogen dominates the mixing and dilution processes.

Automotive proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have finally reached a state of technological readiness where several major automotive companies are commercially leasing and selling fuel cell electric vehicles including Toyota Honda and Hyundai. These now claim vehicle speed and acceleration refueling time driving range and durability that rival conventional internal combustion engines and in most cases outperform battery electric vehicles. The residual challenges and areas of improvement which remain for PEMFCs are performance at high current density durability and cost. These are expected to be resolved over the coming decade while hydrogen infrastructure needs to become widely available. Here we briefly discuss the status of automotive PEMFCs misconceptions about the barriers that platinum usage creates and the remaining hurdles for the technology to become broadly accepted and implemented.