Norway

This paper describes a series of explosion experiments in inhomogeneous hydrogen air clouds in a standard 20′ ISO container. Test parameter variations included nozzle configuration jet direction reservoir back pressure time of ignition after release and degree of obstacles. The paper presents the experimental setup resulting pressure records and high speed videos. The explosion pressures from the experiments without obstacles were in the range of 0.4–7 kPa. In the experiments with obstacles the gas exploded more violently producing pressures in order of 100 kPa.

The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) recognizes in its roadmap for Research Infrastructures that ?in the near future hydrogen as an energy carrier derived from various other fuels and fuel cells as energy transformers are expected to come into a major role for mobility but also for different other mobile and stationary applications? |1|. This modern hydrogen driven society lags far behind the reality. Because of that it is conform to question the current situation concerning the belief that already most is comprehensively investigated and developed concerning hydrogen technology is correct and already done. From that it appears the hydrogen technology is market ready only partial and not prepared in a sufficient way to get finally included and adopted in modern hydrogen driven society and especially the acceptance of the society is a critical. Beside this critical view through society several scientific and technical bottlenecks still discoverable. Nevertheless it is possible to foster furthermore science and development on hydrogen technology. The ?Integrating European Infrastructure? was created to support science and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies towards European strategy for sustainable competitive and secure energy also while identifying scientific and technical bottlenecks to support solutions based on. Its acronym is H2FC European Infrastructure and was formed to integrate the European R&D community around rare and/or unique infrastructural elements that will facilitate and significantly enhance the research and development of hydrogen and fuel cell technology.

One of the main benefits sought by including hydrogen in the alternative fuels mix is emissions reduction – eventually by 100%. However in the near term there is a very significant cost differential between fossil fuels and hydrogen. Hythane (a blend of hydrogen and natural gas) can act as a viable next step on the path to an ultimate hydrogen economy as a fuel blend consisting of 8−30 % hydrogen in methane can reduce emissions while not requiring significant changes in existing infrastructure. This work seeks to evaluate whether hythane may be safer than both hydrogen and methane under certain conditions. This is due to the fact hythane combines the positive safety properties of hydrogen (strong buoyancy high diffusivity) and methane (much lower flame speeds and narrower flammability limits as compared to hydrogen). For this purpose several different mixture compositions (e.g. 8 % 20 % and 30 % hydrogen) are considered. The evaluation of (a) dispersion characteristics (which are more positive than for methane) (b) combustion characteristics (which are closer to methane than hydrogen) and (c) Combined dispersion + explosion risk is performed. This risk is expected to be comparable to that of pure methane possibly lower in some situations and definitely lower than for pure hydrogen. The work is performed using the CFD software FLACS that has been well-validated for safety studies of both natural gas/methane and hydrogen systems. The first part of the work will involve validating the flame speeds and flammability limits predicted by FLACS against values available in literature. The next part of the work involves validating the overpressures predicted by the CFD tool for combustion of premixed mixtures of methane and hydrogen with air against available experimental data. In the end practical systems such as vehicular tunnels garages etc. is used to demonstrate positive safety benefits of hythane with comparisons to similar simulations for both hydrogen and methane.

This work presents the results of the Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem (SBEP) V20 of Work Package 6 (WP6) of HySafe Network of Excellence (NoE) co-funded by the European Commission in the frame of evaluating the quality and suitability of codes models and user practices by comparative assessments of code results. The benchmark problem SBEP-V20 covers release scenarios that were experimentally investigated in the past using helium as a substitute to hydrogen. The aim of the experimental investigations was to determine the ventilation requirements for parking hydrogen fuelled vehicles in residential garages. Helium was released under the vehicle for 2 h with 7.200 l/h flow rate. The leak rate corresponded to a 20% drop of the peak power of a 50 kW fuel cell vehicle. Three double vent garage door geometries are considered in this numerical investigation. In each case the vents are located at the top and bottom of the garage door. The vents vary only in height. In the first case the height of the vents is 0.063 m in the second 0.241 m and in the third 0.495 m. Four HySafe partners participated in this benchmark. The following CFD packages with the respective models were applied to simulate the experiments: ADREA-HF using k–ɛ model by partner NCSRD FLACS using k–ɛ model by partner DNV FLUENT using k–ɛ model by partner UPM and CFX using laminar and the low-Re number SST model by partner JRC. This study compares the results predicted by the partners to the experimental measurements at four sensor locations inside the garage with an attempt to assess and validate the performance of the different numerical approaches.

A methodology for explosion and fire risk analyses in enclosed rooms is presented. The objectives of this analysis are to accurately predict the risks associated with hydrogen leaks in maritime applications and to use the approach to provide decision support regarding design and risk-prevention and risk mitigating measures. The methodology uses CFD tools and simpler consequence models for ventilation dispersion and explosion scenarios as well as updated frequency for leaks and ignition. Risk is then efficiently calculated with a Monte Carlo routine capturing the transient behavior of the leak. This makes it possible to efficiently obtain effects of sensitivities and design options maintaining safety and reducing costs.

Nomograms for assessment of hazard distances from a blast wave generated by a catastrophic rupture of stand-alone (stationary) and onboard compressed hydrogen cylinder in a fire are presented. The nomograms are easy to use hydrogen safety engineering tools. They were built using the validated and recently published analytical model. Two types of nomograms were developed – one for use by first responders and another for hydrogen safety engineers. The paper underlines the importance of an international effort to unify harm and damage criteria across different countries as the discrepancies identified by the authors gave the expected results of different hazard distances for different criteria.

The SH2IFT project combines social and technical scientific methods to address knowledge gaps regarding safe handling and use of gaseous and liquid hydrogen. Theoretical approaches will be complemented by fire and explosion experiments with emphasis on topics of strategic importance to Norway such as tunnel safety maritime applications etc. Experiments include Rapid Phase Transition Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion and jet fires. This paper gives an overview of the project and preliminary results.

This paper presents results from an experimental study of vented hydrogen deflagrations in 20-foot ISO containers. The scenarios investigated include 14 tests with explosion venting through the doors of the containers and 20 tests with venting through openings in the roof. The parameters investigated include hydrogen concentration vent area type of venting device and the level of congestion inside the containers. All tests involved homogeneous and initially quiescent hydrogen-air mixtures. The results demonstrate the strong effect of congestion on the maximum reduced explosion pressures which typically is not accounted for in current standards and guidelines for explosion protection. The work is a deliverable from work package 2 (WP2) in the project “Improving hydrogen safety for energy applications through pre-normative research on vented deflagrations” or HySEA which receives funding from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU) under grant agreement no. 671461.

The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software FLACS has primarily been developed to model dispersion and explosion phenomena; however models for the simulation of jet fires are under development. The aim is to be able to predict industrial fires efficiently and with good precision.  Newly developed models include e.g. flame models for non-premixed flames discrete transfer radiation model as well as soot models. Since the time scales for fire simulations are longer than for explosions the computational speed is important. The recent development of non-compressible and parallel solvers in FLACS may therefore be important to ensure efficiency. Hydrogen flames may be invisible will generate no soot and tend to radiate less than hydrocarbon fuels. Due to high pressure storage the flame lengths can be significant. Simpler jet flame relations can not predict the jet flame interaction with objects and barriers and thus the heat loads on impacted objects. The development of efficient and precise CFD-tools for hydrogen fires is therefore important. In this paper the new models for the simulation of fire are described. These models are currently under development and this manuscript describes the current status of the work. Jet fire experiments performed by Health and Safety Laboratories (HSL) both free jets and impinging jets will also be simulated to evaluate the applicability and validity of the new fire models.

Some 3% of global energy consumption today is used to produce hydrogen. Only 0.002% of this hydrogen about 1000 tonnes per annum(i) is used as an energy carrier. Yet as this timely position paper from DNV GL indicates hydrogen can become a major clean energy carrier in a world struggling to limit global warming.<br/>The company’s recently published 2018 Energy Transition Outlook(1) projects moderate uptake of hydrogen in this role towards 2050 then significant growth towards 2100. Building on that this position paper provides a more granular analysis of hydrogen as an energy carrier.

Hydrogen stations and supply systems for public transport have been demonstrated in a number of European cities during the last four years. The first refuelling facility was put into operation in Reykjavik in April 2003. Experience from the four years of operation shows that safety related incidents are more frequent in the user interface than in the other parts of the hydrogen refuelling station (HRS). This might be expected taking into account the fact that the refuelling is manually operated and that according to industrial statistics human failures normally stand for more than 80% of all safety related incidents. On the other hand the HRS experience needs special attention since the refuelling at the existing stations is carried out by well trained personnel and that procedures and systems are followed closely. So far the quality and safety approach to hydrogen refuelling stations has been based on industrial experience. This paper addresses the challenge related to the development of safe robust and easy to operate refuelling systems. Such systems require well adapted components and system solutions as well as user procedures. The challenge to adapt the industrial based quality and safety philosophy and methodologies to new hydrogen applications and customers in the public sector is addressed. Risk based safety management and risk acceptance criteria relevant to users and third party are discussed in this context. Human factors and the use of incident reporting as a tool for continuous improvement are also addressed. The paper is based on internal development programmes for hydrogen refuelling stations in Hydro and on participation in international EU and IPHE projects such as CUTE HyFLEET:CUTE HySafe and HyApproval.

Hydrogen will presumably become an important substitute for carbon as a reductant in the metallurgical industry for processes such as steel production. However the challenge to supply enough CO2 -free hydrogen for metallurgical processes has not been resolved yet. This paper reviews different production technologies for hydrogen and their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally it will highlight the development of plasma technology to produce hydrogen and carbon black which has been taking place at SINTEF during the last 30 years.

With regard to the goals of the European HySafe Network research facilities are essential for the experimental investigation of relevant phenomena for testing devices and safety concepts as well as for the generation of validation data for the various numerical codes and models. The integrating activity ‘Integration of Experimental Facilities (IEF)’ has provided basic support for jointly performed experimental work within HySafe. Even beyond the funding period of the NoE HySafe in the 6th Framework Programme IEF represents a long lasting effort for reaching sustainable integration of the experimental research capacities and expertise of the partners from different research fields. In order to achieve a high standard in the quality of experimental data provided by the partners emphasis was put on the know-how transfer between the partners. The strategy for reaching the objectives consisted of two parts. On the one hand a documentation of the experimental capacities has been prepared and analysed. On the other hand a communication base has been established by means of biannual workshops on experimental issues. A total of 8 well received workshops has been organised covering topics from measurement technologies to safety issues. Based on the information presented by the partners a working document on best practice including the joint experimental knowledge of all partners with regard to experiments and instrumentation was created. Preserving the character of a working document it was implemented in the IEF wiki website which was set up in order to provide a central communication platform. The paper gives an overview of the IEF network activities over the last 5 years.

The hydrogen economy has received resurging interest in recent years as more countries commit to net-zero CO₂ emissions around the mid-century. “Blue” hydrogen from natural gas with CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) is one promising sustainable hydrogen supply option. Although conventional CO₂ capture imposes a large energy penalty advanced process concepts using the chemical looping principle can produce blue hydrogen at efficiencies even exceeding the conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) process without CCS. One such configuration is gas switching reforming (GSR) which uses a Ni-based oxygen carrier material to catalyze the SMR reaction and efficiently supply the required process heat by combusting an off-gas fuel with integrated CO₂ capture. The present study investigates the potential of advanced La-Fe-based oxygen carrier materials to further increase this advantage using a gas switching partial oxidation (GSPOX) process. These materials can overcome the equilibrium limitations facing conventional catalytic SMR and achieve direct hydrogen production using a water-splitting reaction. Results showed that the GSPOX process can achieve mild efficiency improvements relative to GSR in the range of 0.6–4.1%-points with the upper bound only achievable by large power and H₂ co-production plants employing a highly efficient power cycle. These performance gains and the avoidance of toxicity challenges posed by Ni-based oxygen carriers create a solid case for the further development of these advanced materials. If successful results from this work indicate that GSPOX blue hydrogen plants can outperform an SMR benchmark with conventional CO₂ capture by more than 10%-points both in terms of efficiency and CO₂ avoidance.

Maritime transport faces increasing pressure to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to be in accordance with the Paris Agreement. For this to happen low- and zero-carbon energy solutions need to be developed. In this paper we draw on sustainability transition literature and introduce the technological innovation system (TIS) framework to the field of maritime transportation research. The TIS approach analytically distinguishes between different innovation system functions that are important for new technologies to develop and diffuse beyond an early phase of experimentation. This provides a basis for technology-specific policy recommendations. We apply the TIS framework to the case of battery-electric and hydrogen energy solutions for coastal maritime transport in Norway. Whereas both battery-electric and hydrogen solutions have developed rapidly the former is more mature and has a strong momentum. Public procurement and other policy instruments have been crucial for developments to date and will be important for these technologies to become viable options for shipping more generally.

Detailed heat exchanger designs are determined by matching intermediate temperatures in a large-scale Claude refrigeration process for liquefaction of hydrogen with a capacity of 125 tons/day. A comparison is made of catalyst filled plate-fin and spiral-wound heat exchangers by use of a flexible and robust modelling framework for multi-stream heat exchangers that incorporates conversion of ortho-to para-hydrogen in the hydrogen feed stream accurate thermophysical models and a distributed resolution of all streams and wall temperatures. Maps of the local exergy destruction in the heat exchangers are presented which enable the identification of several avenues to improve their performances.<br/>The heat exchanger duties vary between 1 and 31 MW and their second law energy efficiencies vary between 72.3% and 96.6%. Due to geometrical constraints imposed by the heat exchanger manufacturers it is necessary to employ between one to four parallel plate-fin heat exchanger modules while it is possible to use single modules in series for the spiral-wound heat exchangers. Due to the lower surface density and heat transfer coefficients in the spiral-wound heat exchangers their weights are 2–14 times higher than those of the plate-fin heat exchangers.<br/>In the first heat exchanger hydrogen feed gas is cooled from ambient temperature to about 120 K by use of a single mixed refrigerant cycle. Here most of the exergy destruction occurs when the high-pressure mixed refrigerant enters the single-phase regime. A dual mixed refrigerant or a cascade process holds the potential to remove a large part of this exergy destruction and improve the efficiency. In many of the heat exchangers uneven local exergy destruction reveals a potential for further optimization of geometrical parameters in combination with process parameters and constraints.<br/>The framework presented makes it possible to compare different sources of exergy destruction on equal terms and enables a qualified specification on the maximum allowed pressure drops in the streams. The mole fraction of para-hydrogen is significantly closer to the equilibrium composition through the entire process for the spiral-wound heat exchangers due to the longer residence time. This reduces the exergy destruction from the conversion of ortho-hydrogen and results in a higher outlet mole fraction of para-hydrogen from the process.<br/>Because of the higher surface densities of the plate-fin heat exchangers they are the preferred technology for hydrogen liquefaction unless a higher conversion to heat exchange ratio is desired.

Magnesium hydride owns the largest share of publications on solid materials for hydrogen storage. The “Magnesium group” of international experts contributing to IEA Task 32 “Hydrogen Based Energy Storage” recently published two review papers presenting the activities of the group focused on magnesium hydride based materials and on Mg based compounds for hydrogen and energy storage. This review article not only overviews the latest activities on both fundamental aspects of Mg-based hydrides and their applications but also presents a historic overview on the topic and outlines projected future developments. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and experimental studies of Mg-H system at extreme pressures kinetics and thermodynamics of the systems based on MgH₂ nanostructuring new Mg-based compounds and novel composites and catalysis in the Mg based H storage systems. Finally thermal energy storage and upscaled H storage systems accommodating MgH₂ are presented.

In the summer of 1985 a severe hydrogen-air explosion occurred in an ammonia plant in Norway. The accident resulted in two fatalities and the destruction of the building where the explosion took place. This paper presents the main findings from an investigation in 1985 and 1986 of the gas explosion and its consequences. The event started when a gasket in a water pump was blown out. The water pump was situated inside a 100 m long 10 m wide and 7 m high building. The pump was feeding water to a vessel containing hydrogen gas at pressure of 30 bars. This pressure caused a back flow of water flow through the pump and out through the failed gasket. The hydrogen reached the leakage point after about 3 minutes. The discharge of gas lasted some 20 to 30 seconds before the explosion occurred. The total mass of the hydrogen discharge was estimated at 10 to 20 kg hydrogen. The main explosion was very violent and it is likely that the gas cloud detonated. The ignition source was almost certainly a hot bearing. Several damage indicators were used to estimate the amount of hydrogen that exploded. The indicators include deflection of pipes and panels distances traveled by fragments and the distribution of glass breakage. We found that 3.5 to 7 kg of hydrogen must have been burning violently in the explosion. Window glass was broken up to 700 m from the centre of the explosion. Concrete blocks originally part of the north wall of the building and weighing 1.2 metric tons were thrown up to 16 meters. The roof of the building was lifted by an estimated 1.5 meters before resettling. The displacement of the roof caused a guillotine break of a 350 mm diameter pipe connected to the vessel that was the source of the original gas discharge. The gas composition in the vessel was 65 - 95 % hydrogen. This resulted in a large horizontal jet fire lasting about 30 seconds. Minor explosions occurred in the plant culvert system.<br/><br/>To our knowledge this gas explosion is one of the largest industrial hydrogen explosions reported. We believe this case history is a valuable reference for those who are investigating the nature of accidental<br/>hydrogen explosions.

Flame acceleration and deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) is simulated with a numerical code based on a flux limiter centred method for hyperbolic differential equations. The energy source term is calculated by a Riemann solver for the in homogeneous Euler equations for the turbulent combustion and a two-step reaction model for hydrogen-air. The transport equations are filtered for large eddy simulation (LES) and the sub filter turbulence is modelled by a transport equation for the the turbulent kinetic energy. The flame tracking is handled by the G-equation for turbulent flames. Numerical results are compared to pressure histories from physical experiments. These experiments are performed in a closed circular 4m long tube with inner diameter of 0.107m. The tube is filled with hydrogen-air mixture at 1atm which is at rest when ignited. The ignition is located at one end of the tube. The tube is fitted with an obstruction with circular opening 1m down the tube from the ignition point. The obstruction has a blockage ratio of 0.92 and a thickness of 0.01m. The obstruction creates high pressures in the ignition end of the tube and very high gas velocities in and behind the obstruction opening. The flame experiences a detonation to deflagration transition (DDT) in the super sonic jet created by the obstruction. Pressure build-up in the ignition end of the tube is simulated with some discrepancies. The DDT in the supersonic jet is simulated but the position of the DDT is strongly dependent on the simulated pressure in the ignition end.

In order to facilitate the introduction of a new technology as it is the utilization of hydrogen as an energy carrier development of safety codes and standards besides the conduction of demonstrative projects becomes a very important action to be realized. Useful tools of work could be the existing gaseous fuel codes (natural gas and propane) regulating the stationary and automotive applications. Some safety codes have been updated to include hydrogen but they have been based on criteria and/or data applicable for large industrial facilities making the realization of public hydrogen infrastructures prohibitive in terms of space. In order to solve the above mentioned problems others questions come out: how these safety distances have been defined? Which hazard events have been taken as reference for calculation? Is it possible to reduce the safety distances through an appropriate design of systems and components or through the predisposition of adequate mitigation measures? This paper presents an analysis of the definitions of “safety distances” and “hazardous locations” as well as a synoptic analysis of the different values in force in several States for hydrogen and natural gas. The above mentioned synoptic table will highlight the lacks and so some fields that need to be investigated in order to produce a suitable hydrogen standard.

This paper presents a compilation and discussion of the results supplied by HySafe partners participating in the Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem (SBEP) V1 which is based on an experiment on hydrogen release mixing and distribution inside a vessel. Each partner has his own point of view of the problem and uses a different approach to the solution. The main characteristics of the models employed for the calculations are compared. The comparison between results together with the experimental data when available is made. Relative deviations of each model from the experimental values are also included. Explanations and interpretations of the results are presented together with some useful conclusions for future work.

For decades risk assessment has been an important tool in risk management of activities in several industries world wide. It provides among others authorities and stakeholders with a sound basis for creating awareness about existing and potential hazards and risks and making decisions related to how they can prioritise and plan expenditures on risk reduction. The overall goal of the ongoing HySafe project is to contribute to the safe transition to a more sustainable development in Europe by facilitating the safe introduction of hydrogen technologies and applications. An essential element in this is the demonstration of safety: that all safety aspects related to production transportation and public use are controlled to avoid that introducing hydrogen as energy carrier should pose unacceptable risk to the society.<br/>History has proven that introducing risk analysis to new industries is beneficial e.g. in transportation and power production and distribution. However this will require existing methods and standards to be adapted to the specific applications. Furthermore when trying to quantify risk it is of utmost importance to have access to relevant accident and incident information. Such data may in many cases not be readily available and the utilisation of them will then require specific and long lasting data collection initiatives.<br/>In this paper we will present the work that has been undertaken in the HySafe project in developing methodologies and collecting data for risk management of hydrogen infrastructure. Focus is laid on the development of risk acceptance criteria and on the demonstration of safety and benefits to the public. A trustworthy demonstration of safety will have to be based on facts especially on facts widely known and emphasis will thus be put on the efforts taken to establish and operate a database containing hydrogen accident and incident information which can be utilised in risk assessment of hydrogen applications. A demonstration of safety will also have to include a demonstration of risk control measures and the paper will also present work carried out on safety distances and ignition source control.

The future of hydrogen energy is wrapped up with the future of natural gas renewable energy and carbon capture and storage (CCS). This yields useful synergies but also political economic and technical complexity. Nevertheless our survey of more than 1000 senior oil and gas professionals suggests a more certain future for hydrogen and that the time is right to begin scaling the hydrogen economy.

When introducing hydrogen-fuelled vehicles an evaluation of the potential change in risk level should be performed. It is widely accepted that outdoor accidental releases of hydrogen from single vehicles will disperse quickly and not lead to any significant explosion hazard. The situation may be different for more confined situations such as parking garages workshops or tunnels. Experiments and computer modelling are both important for understanding the situation better. This paper reports a simulation study to examine what if any is the explosion risk associated with hydrogen vehicles in tunnels. Its aim was to further our understanding of the phenomena surrounding hydrogen releases and combustion inside road tunnels and furthermore to demonstrate how a risk assessment methodology developed for the offshore industry could be applied to the current task. This work is contributing to the EU Sixth Framework (Network of Excellence) project HySafe aiding the overall understanding that is also being collected from previous studies new experiments and other modelling activities. Releases from hydrogen cars (containing 700 bar gas tanks releasing either upwards or downwards or liquid hydrogen tanks releasing only upwards) and buses (containing 350 bar gas tanks releasing upwards) for two different tunnel layouts and a range of longitudinal ventilation conditions have been studied. The largest release modelled was 20 kg H2 from four cylinders in a bus (via one vent) in 50 seconds with an initial release rate around 1000 g/s. Comparisons with natural gas (CNG) fuelled vehicles have also been performed. The study suggests that for hydrogen vehicles a typical worst-case risk assessment approach assuming the full gas inventory being mixed homogeneously at stoichiometry could lead to severe explosion loads. However a more extensive study with more realistic release scenarios reduced the predicted hazard significantly. The flammable gas cloud sizes were still large for some of the scenarios but if the actual reactivity of the predicted clouds is taken into account very moderate worst-case explosion pressures are predicted. As a final step of the risk assessment approach a probabilistic QRA study is performed in which probabilities are assigned to different scenarios time dependent ignition modelling is applied and equivalent stoichiometric gas clouds are used to translate reactivity of dispersed nonhomogeneous clouds. The probabilistic risk assessment study is based on over 200 dispersion and explosion CFD calculations using the commercially available tool FLACS. The risk assessment suggested a maximum likely pressure level of 0.1-0.3 barg at the pressure sensors that were used in the study. Somewhat higher pressures are seen elsewhere due to reflections (e.g. under the vehicles). Several other interesting observations were found in the study. For example the study suggests that for hydrogen releases the level of longitudinal tunnel ventilation has only a marginal impact on the predicted risk since the momentum of the releases and buoyancy of hydrogen dominates the mixing and dilution processes.

Automotive proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have finally reached a state of technological readiness where several major automotive companies are commercially leasing and selling fuel cell electric vehicles including Toyota Honda and Hyundai. These now claim vehicle speed and acceleration refueling time driving range and durability that rival conventional internal combustion engines and in most cases outperform battery electric vehicles. The residual challenges and areas of improvement which remain for PEMFCs are performance at high current density durability and cost. These are expected to be resolved over the coming decade while hydrogen infrastructure needs to become widely available. Here we briefly discuss the status of automotive PEMFCs misconceptions about the barriers that platinum usage creates and the remaining hurdles for the technology to become broadly accepted and implemented.