Education, Training & Lessons Learned

A best practice is a technique or methodology that has reliably led to a desired result. A wealth of experience regarding the safe use and handling of hydrogen exists as a result of an extensive history in a wide variety of industrial and aerospace settings. Hydrogen Safety Best Practices (www.h2bestpractices.org) captures this vast knowledge base and makes it publicly available to those working with hydrogen and related systems including those just starting to work with hydrogen. This online manual is organized under a number of hierarchical technical content categories. References including publications and other online links that deal with the safety aspects of hydrogen are compiled for easy access. This paper discusses the development of Hydrogen Safety Best Practices as a safety knowledge tool the nature of its technical content and the steps taken to enhance its value and usefulness. Specific safety event examples are provided to illustrate the link between technical content in the online best practices manual and a companion safety knowledge tool Hydrogen Incident Reporting and Lessons Learned (www.h2incidents.org) which encourages the sharing of lessons learned and other safety event information.

A suitably trained emergency response force is an essential component for safe implementation of any type of fuel infrastructure. Because of the relative newness of hydrogen as a fuel however appropriate emergency response procedures are not yet well understood by responder workforces across the United States and around the world. A significant near-term training effort is needed to ensure that the future hydrogen infrastructure can be developed and operated with acceptable incident risk. Efforts are presently underway at the HAMMER site in Washington State to develop curricula related to hydrogen properties and behavior identification of problems (e.g. incorrect equipment installation) and appropriate response and other relevant information intended for classroom instruction. In addition a number of hands-on training props are planned for realistic simulation of hydrogen incidents in order to convey proper response procedures in high-pressure cryogenic high leakage or other high-risk accident situations. Surveys of emergency responders fire marshals regulatory authorities manufacturers and others are being undertaken to ensure that the capabilities developed and offered at HAMMER will meet the acknowledged need. This paper describes the training curricula and props anticipated at HAMMER and is intended to provide useful information to others planning similar training programs.

In close cooperation with their Canadian counterparts United States public safety authorities are taking the first steps towards creating a proper infrastructure to ensure the safe use of the new hydrogen fuel cells now being introduced commercially. Currently public safety officials are being asked to permit hydrogen fuel cells for stationary power and as emergency power backups for the telecommunications towers that exist everywhere. Consistent application of the safety codes is difficult – in part because it is new – yet it is far more complex to train emergency responders to deal safely with the inevitable hydrogen incidents. The US and Canadian building and fire codes and standards are similar but not identical. The US and Canadian rules are unlikely to be useful to other nations without modification to suit different regulatory systems. However emergency responder safety training is potentially more universal. The risks strategies and tactics are unlikely to differ much by region. The Hydrogen Executive Leadership Panel (HELP) made emergency responder safety training its first priority because the transition to hydrogen depends on keeping incidents small and inoffensive and the public and responders safe from harm. One might think that advising 1.2 million firefighters and 800000 law enforcement officers about hydrogen risks is no more complicated than adding guidance to a website. One would be wrong. The term “training” has specific legal implications which may vary by state. For hazardous materials federal requirements apply. Insurance companies place training requirements on the policies they sell to fire departments including the thousands of small all-volunteer departments which may operate as private corporations. Union contracts may define training and promotions may be based on satisfactorily completed certain levels of training. Emergency responders could no sooner learn how to extinguish a<br/>hydrogen fire by reading a webpage than a person could learn to ride a bicycle by reading a book. Procedures must be learned by listening reading and then doing. Regular practice is necessary. As new hydrogen applications are commercialized additional responder training may be necessary. This highlights another obstacle emergency responders’ ability to travel distances and take the time to undergo training. Historically fire academies established adjunct instructor programs and satellite academies to bring the training to firefighters. The large well-equipped academies are typically used for specialized training. States rarely have enough instructors and instructors often must take the time to create a course outline research each point and produce a program that is informative useful and holds the attention of responders. The challenge of training emergency responders seems next to impossible but public safety authorities are asked to tackle the impossible every day and a model exists to move forward in the U.S. Over the past few years the National Association of State Fire Marshals and U.S. Department of Transportation enlisted the help of emergency responders and industry to create a standardized approach to train emergency responders to deal with pipeline incidents. A curriculum and training materials were created and more than 26000 sets have been distributed for free to public safety agencies nationwide. More than 8000 instructors have been trained to use these materials that are now part of the regular training in 23 states. Using this model HELP intends to ensure that all emergency responders are trained to address hydrogen risks. The model and the rigorous scenario analysis and review used to developing the operational and technical training is addressed in this paper.

In the summer of 1985 a severe hydrogen-air explosion occurred in an ammonia plant in Norway. The accident resulted in two fatalities and the destruction of the building where the explosion took place. This paper presents the main findings from an investigation in 1985 and 1986 of the gas explosion and its consequences. The event started when a gasket in a water pump was blown out. The water pump was situated inside a 100 m long 10 m wide and 7 m high building. The pump was feeding water to a vessel containing hydrogen gas at pressure of 30 bars. This pressure caused a back flow of water flow through the pump and out through the failed gasket. The hydrogen reached the leakage point after about 3 minutes. The discharge of gas lasted some 20 to 30 seconds before the explosion occurred. The total mass of the hydrogen discharge was estimated at 10 to 20 kg hydrogen. The main explosion was very violent and it is likely that the gas cloud detonated. The ignition source was almost certainly a hot bearing. Several damage indicators were used to estimate the amount of hydrogen that exploded. The indicators include deflection of pipes and panels distances traveled by fragments and the distribution of glass breakage. We found that 3.5 to 7 kg of hydrogen must have been burning violently in the explosion. Window glass was broken up to 700 m from the centre of the explosion. Concrete blocks originally part of the north wall of the building and weighing 1.2 metric tons were thrown up to 16 meters. The roof of the building was lifted by an estimated 1.5 meters before resettling. The displacement of the roof caused a guillotine break of a 350 mm diameter pipe connected to the vessel that was the source of the original gas discharge. The gas composition in the vessel was 65 - 95 % hydrogen. This resulted in a large horizontal jet fire lasting about 30 seconds. Minor explosions occurred in the plant culvert system.<br/><br/>To our knowledge this gas explosion is one of the largest industrial hydrogen explosions reported. We believe this case history is a valuable reference for those who are investigating the nature of accidental<br/>hydrogen explosions.

In recent years federal and state safety authorities have worked to bring emergency planners and responders together with industry the scientific community and consumers to ensure high levels of safety with gas and liquid pipelines and more recently with liquefied natural gas terminals. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is the federal authority on the safe transportation of energy and the National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) represents state-level safety authorities. Together they have produced firefighter safety training materials technical guidance and information for use in communities considering new energy infrastructure and conducted research to support these activities. In 2004 the DOT-NASFM partnership established the Hydrogen Executive Leadership Panel (HELP) to ensure a safe transition from fossil fuels to hydrogen fuel cells. HELP brings together senior policy-level experts from all sectors to understand and recommend mitigation strategies for the risks associated with the transportation and use of hydrogen in motor vehicles. The initial group includes experts from the United States Canada and Europe. HELP will be supported by an advisory committee of emergency planners and responders—individuals well-equipped to describe real-world scenarios of greatest concern—and by a second advisory committee of engineers and scientists who will help translate the real-world scenarios into useful technical solutions. By September 2005 HELP expects to define the initial real-world scenarios of greatest concern and bring together teams of experts to collaborate with automakers energy producers government authorities consumers and public safety officials. Much work lies ahead including creating guidance for hydrogen powered automobiles emergency response safety training establishing test methods to reflect real-world incident scenarios and modifying state and local building and fire codes. The HELP leadership will present its strategic plan and first report at the International Conference on Hydrogen Safety in September 2005.

The purpose of this guide is to provide basic background information on hydrogen technologies. It is not intended to be a comprehensive collection of hydrogen technologies safety information. It is intended to provide project developers code officials and other interested parties the background information to be able to put hydrogen safety in context. For example code officials reviewing permit applications for hydrogen projects will get an understanding of the industrial history of hydrogen basic safety concerns and safety requirements.

During her State of the Union Address the President of the European Commission Ursula Von der Leyen defined 2023 as the "European Year of Skills" highlighting the urgency to overcome the shortage of skilled workforce in Europe a challenge that affects the hydrogen sector as well. The rapid development of the European Hydrogen Value Chain over the coming years is expected to generate approximately 1 million highly skilled jobs by 2030 and up to 5.4 million by 2050.  In the fourth episode titled "Reskill to Repower: Preparing the Hydrogen workforce" our Chief Technology & Market Officer Stephen Jackson discusses with Massimo Valsania VP of Engineering at EthosEnergy and Co-chair of Hydrogen Europe Skills Working Group. Starting off with Massimo's professional background and his current role in our association the two speakers discussed the skills needed in the hydrogen economy and the policies that should be put in place to attract new generations.

In 2020 the Department for Business Enterprise and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) commissioned Energy & Utility Skills to develop and deliver a Hydrogen Competency Framework as part of the Hy4Heat programme. The successful completion of this work is detailed in a new report published today.

The work done by Energy & Utility Skills was underpinned by three key pillars:

Collaboration

• Driving growth in engagement levels across the industry

Scalability

• Designing the framework for both initial trials and any future rollout

Safety

• The framework ensures engineers will have all the skills knowledge and understanding they need

The Hydrogen Competency Framework establishes a series of sequential components designed to ensure any future work done to install and maintain new hydrogen appliances will be completed safely to the highest standards and will only be carried out by hydrogen competent Gas Safe Registered engineers.

The resulting outputs of the design development stages are:

• A Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen and existing hydrocarbon gases
• A Skills Matrix that translates the analysis into skills knowledge and understanding
• An Interim Hydrogen Technical Standard that defines acceptable parameters and requirements for hydrogen installation work
• A Hydrogen Training Specification that will enable training course consistency and facilitate industry recognition
• An independent Hydrogen Assessment Module that will facilitate the addition of a hydrogen competence category on the Gas Safe Register

The Hydrogen Competency Framework is a significant success for the UK Gas Sector. This scalable framework will evolve and expand as the roll out of hydrogen into larger commercial applications occurs ahead of Hydrogen Apprenticeships becoming a reality. In the meantime it delivers the means to ensure the competence of engineers who will pioneer the transition to a hydrogen-fuelled gas industry.

More details about this report can be found on the Energy & Utility Skills website.