Conceptual Design and Aerostructural Trade-Offs in HydrogenPowered Strut-Braced Wing Aircraft: Insights into Dry and Wet Ultra-High Aspect Ratio Wings

Stringent sustainability goals are set for the next generation of aircraft. A promising novel airframe concept is the ultra-high aspect ratio Strut-Braced Wing (SBW) aircraft. Hydrogen-based concepts are active contenders for sustainable propulsion. The study compares a medium-range Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) to a kerosene-based SBW aircraft designed with the same top-level requirements. For both concepts, overall design, operating costs, and emissions are evaluated using the tool SUAVE. Furthermore, aerostructural optimizations are performed for the wing mass of SBW aircraft with and without wing-based fuel tanks. Results show that the main difference in the design point definition results from a higher zero-lift drag due to an extended fuselage housing the LH2 tanks, with a small reduction in the required wing loading. Structural mass increases of the LH2 aircraft due to additional tanks and fuselage structure are mostly offset by fuel mass savings. While the fuel mass accounts for nearly 25% of the kerosene design’s Maximum Take-Off Mass (MTOM), this reduces to 10% for the LH2 design. The LH2 aircraft has 16% higher operating costs with emission levels reduced to 57–82% of the kerosene aircraft, depending on the LH2 production method. For static loads, the absence of fuel acting as bending moment relief in the wing results in an increase in wing structural mass. However, the inclusion of roll rate requirements causes large wing mass increases for both concepts, significantly outweighing dry wing penalties.