Exploratory Numerical Study of Liquid Hydrogen Hazards

Hydrogen is one of a handful of new, low carbon solutions that will be critical for the transition to net zero. The upscaling of production and applications entails that hydrogen is likely to be stored in liquid phase (LH2) at cryogenic conditions to increase its energy density. Widespread LH2 use as an alternative fuel will require significant infrastructure upgrades to accommodate increased bulk transport, storage, and delivery. However, current LH2 bulk storage separation distances are based on subjective expert recommendations rather than experimental observations or physical models. Experimental studies of large-scale LH2 release are challenging and costly. The existing large-scale tests are scarce and numerical studies are a viable option to investigate the existing knowledge gaps. Controlled or accidental releases of LH2 for hydrogen refueling infrastructure would result in high momentum two-phase jets or formation of liquid pools depending on release conditions. Both release scenarios lead to a flammable/explosive cloud, posing a safety issue to the public.
The manuscript reports exploratory study to numerically determine the safety zone resulting from cryogenic hydrogen releases related to LH2 storage and refueling using the in-house HyFOAM solver further modified for gaseous hydrogen releases at cryogenic conditions and the subsequent atmospheric dispersion and ignition within the platform of OpenFOAM V8.0. The current version of the solver neglects the flashing process by assuming that the temperature of the stored LH2 is equal to the boiling point at the atmospheric condition. Numerical simulations of dispersion and subsequent ignition of LH2 release scenarios with respect to different release orientations, release rates, release temperatures and weather conditions were performed. Both hydrogen concentration and temperature fields were predicted, and the boundary of zones within the flammability limit was also defined. The study also considered the sensitivities of the consequences to the release orientation, wind speed, ambient temperature, and release content, etc. The effect of different barrier walls on the deflagration were also evaluated by changing the height and location.