Skip to content
1900

Batteries or Hydrogen or Both for Grid Electricity Storage Upon Full Electrification of 145 Countries with Wind-Water-Solar?

Abstract

Grids require electricity storage. Two emerging storage technologies are battery storage (BS) and green hydrogen storage (GHS) (hydrogen produced and compressed with clean-renewable electricity, stored, then returned to electricity with a fuel cell). An important question is whether GHS alone decreases system cost versus BS alone or BS+GHS. Here, energy costs are modeled in 145 countries grouped into 24 regions. Existing conventional hydropower (CH) storage is used along with new BS and/or GHS. A method is developed to treat CH for both baseload and peaking power. In four regions, only CH is needed. In five, CH+BS is lowest cost. Otherwise, CH+BS+GHS is lowest cost. CH+GHS is never lowest cost. A metric helps estimate whether combining GHS with BS reduces cost. In most regions, merging (versus separating) grid and non-grid hydrogen infrastructure reduces cost. In sum, worldwide grid stability may be possible with CH+BS or CH+BS+GHS. Results are subject to uncertainties.

Funding source: Partial funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) under Federal Award Identification Number W9132T2220006.
Related subjects: Applications & Pathways
Countries: United States
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal5453
2024-01-17
2024-11-22
/content/journal5453
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error