United Kingdom

Energy decarbonisation is essential to achieve Net-Zero emissions goal by 2050. Consequently investments in alternative low-carbon pathways and energy carriers for the heat sector are required. In this study we propose an optimisation framework for the transition of heat sector in Great Britain focusing on hydrogen infrastructure decisions. A spatially-explicit mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) evolution model is developed to minimise the total system’s cost considering investment and operational decisions. The optimisation framework incorporates both long-term planning horizon of 5-year steps from 2035 to 2050 and typical days with hourly resolution. Aiming to alleviate the computational effort of such multiscale model two hierarchical solution approaches are suggested that result in computational time reduction. From the optimisation results it is shown that the installation of gas reforming hydrogen production technologies with CCS and biomass gasification with CCS can provide a cost-effective strategy achieving decarbonisation goal. What-if analysis is conducted to demonstrate further insights for future hydrogen infrastructure investments. Results indicate that as cost is highly dependent on natural gas price Water Electrolysis capacity increases significantly when gas price rises. Moreover the introduction of carbon tax policy can lead to lower CO2 net emissions.

Hydrogen is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to fossil fuels in transportation crucial to achieving net-zero energy goals. However the rapid expansion of hydrogen-powered transportation is outpacing safety standards posing significant risks due to limited operational experience involvement of new actors and lack of targeted guidelines. This study addresses the urgent need for a tailored comprehensive risk assessment framework. Using Structured What-If (SWIFT) and bowtie barrier analysis the research evaluates a hypothetical pilot project focusing on hydrogen refuelling stations vehicles and garages. The study identifies critical hazards and assesses the adequacy of current risk mitigation measures. Key findings reveal gaps in safety practices leading to 41 actionable steps and 5 key activities to help new actors manage hydrogen risks effectively. By introducing novel safety guidelines this research contributes to the development of safe hydrogen use and advances the understanding of hydrogen risks ensuring its sustainable integration into transportation systems.

National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) is aiming to demonstrate through a research and development programme that nuclear enabled hydrogen can be used to support future clean energy systems. Demonstrating the safe operation of hydrogen facilities co-generating with a nuclear reactor will be key to enabling the deployment and success of nuclear enabled hydrogen technologies in the future. During the deployment continuity of supply will be paramount and possibly requires inter-seasonal storage. Co-generation is a means of using a source of energy in this case a nuclear reactor to efficiently produce power and thermal energy. Since a great deal of the heat energy is lost to the environment in a power plant making use of wasted energy for other useful output like the production of hydrogen and direct heating would be advantageous to plant economics and energy system flexibility. The civil nuclear industry is regulated around the world. This approach ensures that all the activities related to the production of power from nuclear and the hazards associated with ionising radiation are controlled in a manner which protects workers members of the public property and the environment. Nuclear safety assessments follow a rigorous process and are required as part of the Nuclear Site Licence. A fundamental requirement which is cited in the UK legislation is that the risks associated with all activities at the licensed site be reduced to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). The principle places a requirement on duty holders to implement measures to reduce risk where doing so is considered reasonable and proportionate. The inclusion of risks for hazardous materials associated with the hydrogen production facilities need to be considered and this requires harmonisation of two different safety and regulatory governance regimes which have not previously interacted in this way. The safety demonstration for nuclear facilities is provided through the Safety Case.

To meet the new regulation for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure which sets targets for electric recharging and hydrogen refuelling infrastructure by 2025 or 2030 a large infrastructure comprising trucksuitable hydrogen refuelling stations will soon be required. However further standardisation is required to support the uptake of hydrogen for heavy-duty transport for Europe’s green energy future. Hydrogen-powered vehicles require pure hydrogen as some contaminants can reduce the performance of the fuel cell even at very low levels. Even if previous projects have paved the way for the development of the European quality infrastructure for hydrogen conformity assessment sampling systems and methods have yet to be developed for heavy-duty hydrogen refuelling stations (HD-HRS). This study reviews different aspects of the sampling of hydrogen at heavy-duty hydrogen refuelling stations for purity assessment with a focus on the current and future specifications and operations at HD-HRS. This study describes the state-of-the art of sampling systems currently under development for use at HD-HRS and highlights a number of aspects which must be taken into consideration to ensure safe and accurate sampling: risk assessment for the whole sampling exercise selection of cylinders methods to prepare cylinders before the sampling filling pressure and venting of the sampling systems.

If hydrogen fuel is available to support the transportation sector decarbonization its usage can be placed either directly onboard in a fuel cell vehicle or indirectly off-board by using a fuel cell power station to produce electricity to charge a battery electric vehicle. Therefore in this work the direct and indirect conversion scenarios of hydrogen to vehicle propulsion were investigated regarding energy efficiency. Thus in the first scenario hydrogen is the fuel for the onboard electricity production to propel a fuel cell vehicle while in the second hydrogen is the electricity source to charge the battery electric vehicle. When simulated for a drive cycle results have shown that the scenario with the onboard fuel cell consumed about 20% less hydrogen demonstrating higher energy efficiency in terms of driving range. However energy efficiency depends on the outside temperature when heat loss utilization is considered. For outside temperatures of − 5 ◦C or higher the system composed of the battery electric vehicle fueled with electricity from the off-board fuel cell was shown to be more energyefficient. For lower temperatures the system composed of the onboard fuel cell again presented higher total (heat + electricity) efficiency. Therefore the results provide valuable insights into how hydrogen fuel can be used for vehicle propulsion supporting the hydrogen economy development.

The UK government plans to phase out pure diesel trains by 2040 and fully decarbonize railways by 2050. Hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) trains electrified trains using pantographs (Electrified Trains) and battery electric multiple unit (BEMU) trains are considered the main solutions for decarbonizing railways. However the range of these decarbonization options’ line upgrade cost advantages is unclear. This paper analyzes the upgrade costs of three types of trains on different lines by constructing a cost model and using particle swarm optimization (PSO) including operating costs and fixed investment costs. For the case of decarbonization of the London St. Pancras to Leicester line the electrified train option is more cost-effective than the other two options under the condition that the service period is 30 years. Then the traffic density range in which three new energy trains have cost advantages on different line lengths is calculated. For route distances under 100 km and with a traffic density of less than 52 trips/day BEMU trains have the lowest average cost while electrified trains are the most costeffective in other ranges. For route distances over 100 km the average cost of HFC trains is lower than that of electrified trains at traffic densities below about 45 trips/day. In addition if hydrogen prices fall by 26 % the cost advantage range of HFC trains will increase to 70 trips per day. For route distances under 100 km BEMU trains still maintain their advantages in terms of lower traffic density.

Energy transition is a key driver to combat climate change and achieve zero carbon future. Sustainable and costeffective hydrogen production will provide valuable addition to the renewable energy mix and help minimize greenhouse gas emissions. This study investigates the performance of in-situ hydrogen production (IHP) process using a full-field compositional model as a precursor to experimental validation The reservoir model was simulated as one geological unit with a single point uniform porosity value of 0.13 and a five-point connection type between cell to minimize computational cost. Twenty-one hydrogen forming reactions were modelled based on the reservoir fluid composition selected for this study. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for the reactions were obtained from published experiments due to the absence of experimental data specific to the reservoir. A total of fifty-four simulation runs were conducted using CMG STARS software for 5478 days and cumulative hydrogen produced for each run was recorded. Results generated were then used to build a proxy model using Box-Behnken design of experiment method and Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel. To ascertain accuracy of the proxy models analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the variables. The average absolute percentage error between the proxy model and numerical simulation was calculated to be 10.82%. Optimization of the proxy model was performed using genetic algorithm to maximize cumulative hydrogen produced. Based on this optimized model the influence of porosity permeability well location injection rate and injection pressure were studied. Key results from this study reveals that lower permeability and porosity reservoirs supports more hydrogen yield injection pressure had a negligible effect on hydrogen yield and increase in oxygen injection rate corelated strongly with hydrogen production until a threshold value beyond which hydrogen yield decreased. The framework developed in the study could be used as tool to assess candidate reservoirs for in-situ hydrogen production.

In this latest OIES podcast James Henderson talks to Bill Farren-Price the new Head of the Gas Programme about some of Key Themes identified by OIES research fellows for 2024. After a review of the outcomes from 2023 we look at the oil and gas markets and discuss a common theme around the contrast between the fundamental tightness in both markets compared with the relative softness of prices. We then move onto a number of energy transition issues starting with some of the key actions from COP28 that need to be implemented in 2024 and following with a review of the outlook for carbon markets hydrogen developments and offshore wind. We also consider the impact of emerging competition between regions over green industrial policy. Finally we consider some of the key geopolitical drivers for 2024 with the influence of China being the most critical. However in an election year for so many countries it will be critical to follow the key policy announcements of the main candidates and of most critically the outcome of the US election in November.

The podcast can be found on their website

Hydrogen trade is an emerging area of interest for hydrogen developers end-users traders and governments around the world. It can enhance system flexibility energy security and clean growth enabling decarbonisation at a lower cost and faster pace. Thanks to its competitive advantage in existing ports terminals and interconnectors the UK is well placed to be the European trade hub for hydrogen and its carriers. With its access to world leading offshore wind generation capacity and geological storage the UK will almost certainly be a net exporter of hydrogen in the future delivering economic value and creating jobs. However hydrogen trade will not be a one-way process. In order to best position the UK as a future hydrogen trade hub there could be value in investing in small scale hydrogen imports and exports to ‘wet the pipes’ and stimulate investment in infrastructure. Imports could also enhance our energy security as a part of a diverse energy mix and support demand whilst domestic production gets up to speed. Both imports and exports will be key to build supply chains and skills and enhance clean growth. With major European economies having established their hydrogen trade strategy there is growing uncertainty as to how the United Kingdom will capitalise on its competitive advantage and position itself in the global hydrogen market. This is the first qualitative report released by Hydrogen UK’s Import and Export Taskforce. This report aims to provide a high-level overview of Hydrogen UK’s vision and recommendations with subsequent reports exploring this topic in further detail.

This report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.

CFD modelling of compressed hydrogen fuelling provides information on the hydrogen and tank structure temperature dynamics required for onboard storage tank design and fuelling protocol development. This study compares five turbulence models to develop a strategy for costeffective CFD simulations of hydrogen fuelling while maintaining a simulation accuracy acceptable for engineering analysis: RANS models k-ε and RSM; hybrid models SAS and DES; and LES model. Simulations were validated against the fuelling experiment of a Type IV 29 L tank available in the literature. For RANS with wall functions and blended models with near-wall treatment the simulated average hydrogen temperatures deviated from the experiment by 1–3% with CFL ≈ 1–3 and dimensionless wall distance y + ≈ 50–500 in the tank. To provide a similar simulation accuracy the LES modelling approach with near-wall treatment requires mesh with wall distance y + ≈ 2–10 and demonstrates the best-resolved flow field with larger velocity and temperature gradients. LES simulation on this mesh however implies a ca. 60 times longer CPU time compared to the RANS modelling approach and 9 times longer compared to the hybrid models due to the time step limit enforced by the CFL ≈ 1.0 criteria. In all cases the simulated pressure histories and inlet mass flow rates have a difference within 1% while the average heat fluxes and maximum hydrogen temperature show a difference within 10%. Compared to LES the k-ε model tends to underestimate and DES tends to overestimate the temperature gradient inside the tank. The results of RSM and SAS are close to those of LES albeit of 8–9 times faster simulations.