Australia

Hydrogen has a very diverse chemistry and reacts with most other elements to form compounds which have fascinating structures compositions and properties. Complex metal hydrides are a rapidly expanding class of materials approaching multi-functionality in particular within the energy storage field. This review illustrates that complex metal hydrides may store hydrogen in the solid state act as novel battery materials both as electrolytes and electrode materials or store solar heat in a more efficient manner as compared to traditional heat storage materials. Furthermore it is highlighted how complex metal hydrides may act in an integrated setup with a fuel cell. This review focuses on the unique properties of light element complex metal hydrides mainly based on boron nitrogen and aluminum e.g. metal borohydrides and metal alanates. Our hope is that this review can provide new inspiration to solve the great challenge of our time: efficient conversion and large-scale storage of renewable energy.

Where does hydrogen fit into a global sustainable energy strategy for the 21st century as we face the enormous challenges of irreversible climate change and uncertain oil supply? This fundamental question is addressed by sketching a sustainable energy strategy that is based predominantly on renewable energy inputs and energy efficiency with hydrogen playing a crucial and substantial role. But this role is not an ex -distributed hydrogen production storage and distribution centres relying on local renewable energy sources and feedstocks would be created to avoid the need for an expensive long-distance hydrogen pipeline system. There would thus be complementary use of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors. Importantly bulk hydrogen storage would provide the strategic energy reserve to guarantee national and global energy security in a world relying increasingly on renewable energy; and longer-term seasonal storage on electricity grids relying mainly on renewables. In the transport sector a 'horses for courses' approach is proposed in which hydrogen fuel cell vehicles would be used in road and rail vehicles requiring a range comparable to today's petrol and diesel vehicles and in coastal and international shipping while liquid hydrogen would probably have to be used in air transport. Plug-in battery electric vehicles would be reserved for shorter-trips. Energy-economic-environmental modelling is recommended as the next step to quantify the net benefits of the overall strategy outlined.

Hydrogen may play a crucial part in delivering a net zero emissions future. Currently hydrogen production storage transport and utilisation are being explored to scope opportunities and to reduce barriers to market activation. One such barrier could be negative public response to hydrogen technologies. Previous research around socio-technical risks finds that public acceptance issues are particularly challenging for emerging remote technical sensitive uncertain or unfamiliar technologies - such as hydrogen. Thus while the hydrogen value chain could offer a range of potential environmental economic and social benefits each will have perceived risks that could challenge the introduction and subsequent roll-out of hydrogen. These potential issues must be identified and managed so that the hydrogen sector can develop adapt or respond appropriately. Geological storage of hydrogen could present challenges in terms of perceived safety. Valuable lessons can be learned from international research and practice of CO2 and natural gas storage in geological formations (for carbon capture and storage CCS and for power respectively). Here we explore these learnings. We consider the similarities and differences between these technologies and how these may affect perceived risks. We also reflect on lessons for effective communication and community engagement. We draw on this to present potential risks to the perceived safety of - and public acceptability of – the geological storage of hydrogen. One of the key lessons learned from CCS and natural gas storage is that progress is most effective when risk communication and public acceptability is considered from the early stages of technology development.

A technoeconomic analysis of photoelectrochemical (PEC) and photovoltaic-electrolytic (PV-E) solar-hydrogen production of 10 000 kg H₂ day⁻¹ (3.65 kilotons per year) was performed to assess the economics of each technology and to provide a basis for comparison between these technologies as well as within the broader energy landscape. Two PEC systems differentiated primarily by the extent of solar concentration (unconcentrated and 10× concentrated) and two PV-E systems differentiated by the degree of grid connectivity (unconnected and grid supplemented) were analyzed. In each case a base-case system that used established designs and materials was compared to prospective systems that might be envisioned and developed in the future with the goal of achieving substantially lower overall system costs. With identical overall plant efficiencies of 9.8% the unconcentrated PEC and non-grid connected PV-E system base-case capital expenses for the rated capacity of 3.65 kilotons H₂ per year were $205 MM ($293 per m² of solar collection area (m_S⁻²) $14.7 W_H2P⁻¹) and $260 MM ($371 mS−2 $18.8 W_H2P⁻¹) respectively. The untaxed plant-gate levelized costs for the hydrogen product (LCH) were $11.4 kg⁻¹ and $12.1 kg⁻¹ for the base-case PEC and PV-E systems respectively. The 10× concentrated PEC base-case system capital cost was $160 MM ($428 m_S−2 $11.5 WH₂P⁻¹) and for an efficiency of 20% the LCH was $9.2 kg−1. Likewise the grid supplemented base-case PV-E system capital cost was $66 MM ($441 _mS⁻² $11.5 W_H2P⁻¹) and with solar-to-hydrogen and grid electrolysis system efficiencies of 9.8% and 61% respectively the LCH was $6.1 kg⁻¹. As a benchmark a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) based grid-connected electrolysis system was analyzed. Assuming a system efficiency of 61% and a grid electricity cost of $0.07 kWh⁻¹ the LCH was $5.5 kg⁻¹. A sensitivity analysis indicated that relative to the base-case increases in the system efficiency could effect the greatest cost reductions for all systems due to the areal dependencies of many of the components. The balance-of-systems (BoS) costs were the largest factor in differentiating the PEC and PV-E systems. No single or combination of technical advancements based on currently demonstrated technology can provide sufficient cost reductions to allow solar hydrogen to directly compete on a levelized cost basis with hydrogen produced from fossil energy. Specifically a cost of CO₂ greater than ∼$800 (ton CO₂)−1 was estimated to be necessary for base-case PEC hydrogen to reach price parity with hydrogen derived from steam reforming of methane priced at $12 GJ⁻¹ ($1.39 (kg H₂)⁻¹). A comparison with low CO₂ and CO₂-neutral energy sources indicated that base-case PEC hydrogen is not currently cost-competitive with electrolysis using electricity supplied by nuclear power or from fossil-fuels in conjunction with carbon capture and storage. Solar electricity production and storage using either batteries or PEC hydrogen technologies are currently an order of magnitude greater in cost than electricity prices with no clear advantage to either battery or hydrogen storage as of yet. Significant advances in PEC technology performance and system cost reductions are necessary to enable cost-effective PEC-derived solar hydrogen for use in scalable grid-storage applications as well as for use as a chemical feedstock precursor to CO₂-neutral high energy-density transportation fuels. Hence such applications are an opportunity for foundational research to contribute to the development of disruptive approaches to solar fuels generation systems that can offer higher performance at much lower cost than is provided by current embodiments of solar fuels generators. Efforts to directly reduce CO₂ photoelectrochemically or electrochemically could potentially produce products with higher value than hydrogen but many as yet unmet challenges include catalytic efficiency and selectivity and CO₂ mass transport rates and feedstock cost. Major breakthroughs are required to obtain viable economic costs for solar hydrogen production but the barriers to achieve cost-competitiveness with existing large-scale thermochemical processes for CO₂ reduction are even greater.

Australian Gas Infrastructure Group’s (AGIG’s) vision is to be the leading gas infrastructure business in Australia this means delivering for our customers being a good employer and being sustainably cost efficient. Establishing and developing a hydrogen industry is a key pathway for us to achieve our vision.



In South Australia AGIG is pioneering the introduction of hydrogen into its existing gas distribution networks through the Hydrogen Park South Australia (HyP SA) project. With safety our top priority we would like to give an overview of the safety considerations of our site our network methodology and the development of new safety procedures and culture regarding the production handling and reticulation of a 5% hydrogen blend.



We will cover three themes each having a safety story that is specific to the Australian context and to the project’s success:



The Production Plant and Site

Project site safety known hazards and risk mitigation electrical protection safety procedures lighting and security. Hydrogen storage filling and transportation.

The Network

Securing the network for an isolated safe demonstration footprint. Gas network and hydrogen safety considerations why 5%? Emergency procedures and crew training. New safety regulations blended networks. How does hydrogen perform in a blended gas with respect to leaks? How safe is the existing network and what sensors and controls are we using.

The Home

Introducing blended gas to existing homes. Appliance safety and failure mode analysis. Community engagement and education on a 5% renewable hydrogen gas blend and use in the home

.

We aim to give a comprehensive overview of delivering a safe demonstration network for the HyP SA project in terms of the three main ecosystems that the hydrogen will be present our learnings so far and the development of the safety methodologies that will be applied in the industry in the future.

Recently we have seen hydrogen (re)emerge as an important component of widespread decarbonisation of energy sectors. From an Australian perspective this brings with it an opportunity to store transport and export renewable energy—either as liquefied hydrogen or in a carrier such as ammonia. The growth of the hydrogen industry to now include the power and transport sectors as well as the notion of hydrogen export has broadened the range of safety considerations required and seen them extend into the realm of the consumer for the first time.<br/>Hydrogen as well as ammonia and other carriers such as methanol are existing industrial chemicals which have established protocols for their handling and use in the chemicals sector. As their use in energy and transport increases especially in the context of widespread domestic use their handling and use by inexperienced people in less-controlled environments expands shifting the risk profiles and management systems required. There is also the potential for novel hydrogen carriers such as methylcyclohexane/toluene to reach commercial viability at industrial scale.<br/>This paper will discuss some of these emerging applications of hydrogen and its carriers and discuss some of the technological innovations under development that may accompany a new energy industry— with some consideration given to their potential risks and the required safety considerations. In addition we will also provide an overview of global activity in this area and how new standards and regulations would need to be developed for the adaption of these technologies in an Australian context.

The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has legislated and aims to be net zero emissions by 2045. Such ambitious targets have implications for the contribution of hydrogen and its storage in gas distribution networks Therefore we need to understand now the impacts on the gas distribution network of the transition to 100% hydrogen. Assessment of the viability of decarbonising the ACT gas network will be partly based on the cost of reusing the gas network for the safe and reliable distribution of hydrogen. That task requires each element of the natural gas safety management system to be evaluated.

This article describes the construction of a test facility in Canberra Australia used to identify issues raised by 100% hydrogen use in the medium pressure distribution network consisting of nylon and polyethylene (PE) as a means of identifying measures necessary to ensure ongoing validity of the network's regulatory safety case.

Evoenergy (the ACT's gas distribution company) have constructed a Test Facility incorporating an electrolyser a gas supply pressure reduction and mixing skid a replica gas network and a domestic installation with gas appliances. Jointly with Australian National University (ANU) and Canberra Institute of Technology (CIT) the Company has commenced a program of “bench testing” initially with 100% hydrogen to identify gaps in the safety case specifically focusing on the materials work practices and safety systems in the ACT.

The facility is designed to assess:

•  Materials in use including aged network materials and components
•  Construction and installation techniques both greenfield and live gas work
•  Purging and filling techniques
•  Leak detection both underground and above ground
•  Emergency response and make safe techniques
•  Issues associated with use of hydrogen in light commercial and domestic appliances.

To educate and train:

•  Technicians and gas fitters on infrastructure installation and management
•  Emergency response services on responding to hydrogen related emergencies in a network environment; and
•  Manage public perceptions of hydrogen in a network environment.

Australia has an enviable safety record for the safe and reliable transport distribution and use of natural gas. The ACT natural gas network owned and operated by Evoenergy is one of the newest in Australia and has leveraged off the best materials and practices in Australia to build its network.

The paper addresses major safety issues relating to the production/storage distribution and consumer end use of hydrogen injected into existing gas distribution networks. The analysis is guided by the Safety Management System. The Hydrogen Testing Facility described in the paper provide tools for evaluation of hydrogen safety matters in the ACT and Australia-wide.

Testing to date has confirmed that polyethylene and nylon pipe and their respective jointing techniques can contain 100% hydrogen at pressures used for the distribution of natural gas. Testing has also confirmed that current installation work practices on polyethylene and nylon pipe and joints are suitable for hydrogen service. This finding is subject to variation attributable to staff training and skill levels and further testing has been programmed as outlined in this paper.

Testing of gas isolation by clamping and simulated repair on the hydrogen network has established that standard natural gas isolation techniques work with 100% hydrogen at natural gas pressures.

Magnesium hydride owns the largest share of publications on solid materials for hydrogen storage. The “Magnesium group” of international experts contributing to IEA Task 32 “Hydrogen Based Energy Storage” recently published two review papers presenting the activities of the group focused on magnesium hydride based materials and on Mg based compounds for hydrogen and energy storage. This review article not only overviews the latest activities on both fundamental aspects of Mg-based hydrides and their applications but also presents a historic overview on the topic and outlines projected future developments. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and experimental studies of Mg-H system at extreme pressures kinetics and thermodynamics of the systems based on MgH₂ nanostructuring new Mg-based compounds and novel composites and catalysis in the Mg based H storage systems. Finally thermal energy storage and upscaled H storage systems accommodating MgH₂ are presented.

With downward trends in Australian equipment manufacturing there are increased numbers of overseas designed manufactured and certified hydrogen systems being introduced into Australia. In parallel there are also opportunities for hydrogen and its carriers to be exported to overseas. Certainty of reputable codes and standards is important to meet regulatory requirements and community safety expectations locally and overseas.

This paper is a progress report of Hydrogen Mobility Australia’s (HMA) Technical Committee on mapping the regulatory codes and standards (RCS) gaps in Australia and establishing a pathway together with Standards Australia and Commonwealth and State Governments. This paper will discuss the benefits of the pathway covering the areas of:

• Safety – Enable Australia to implement consensual rules to minimise avoidable risks to persons and goods to an acceptable level
• Environment – Ensure protection of the environment from unacceptable damage due to the operation and effects of products processes and services linked to hydrogen
• Elimination of barriers to trade – Provide consistency between international jurisdictions enabling streamlined entry of hydrogen related equipment from overseas
• Upskilling of Australian industry participants – Gain useful learnings from countries more advanced in their progress in implementing ISO standards and hydrogen sector development

This paper is jointly prepared by representatives of HMA Technical Committee and Department of Energy and Mining South Australian Government. The paper also highlights the initiatives of Commonwealth and State Governments to advance the hydrogen economy.

Hydrogen stored or transported as ammonia has been proposed as a sustainable carbon-free alternative for fossil-fuels in high-temperature industrial processes including power generation. Although ammonia itself is toxic and exhibits both a low flame speed and calorific value it rapidly decomposes to hydrogen in high temperature environments suggesting the potential use in applications which incorporate fuel preheating. In this work the rate of ammonia-to-hydrogen decomposition is initially simulated at elevated temperatures to indicate the proportion of fuel conversion in conditions similar to gas pipelines gas-turbines or furnaces with exhaust-gas recirculation. Following this different proportions of hydrogen and ammonia are numerically simulated in independent zero-dimensional plug-flow-reactors at pressures ranging from atmospheric to 50 MPa and pre-heating temperatures from 600 K to 1600 K. Deflagration of very-lean-to-fuel-rich mixtures was investigated employing air as the oxidant stream. Analyses of these reactors provide estimates of autoignition thresholds of the hydrogen/ammonia blends which are relevant for the safe implementation and operation of hydrogen/ammonia blends or pure ammonia as a fuel source. Further operational considerations are subsequently identified for using ammonia or hydrogen/ammonia blends as a hydrogen fuel carrier by quantifying residual concentrations of hydrogen and ammonia fuel products as well as other toxic emissions within the hot exhaust products.