Safety

The main purpose of this work is to investigate the influence of methane addition in methane-hydrogen-air mixture (φ = 0.8 – 1.6) on the critical conditions for transition to detonation in a 90-deg wedge corner. Similar to hydrogen-air mixtures investigated previously [1] methane-hydrogen-air mixtures results showed three ignition modes weak ignition followed by deflagration with ignition delay time higher than 1 μs strong ignition with instantaneous transition to detonation and third with deflagrative ignition and delayed transition to detonation. Methane addition caused an increase in the range of 3.25 – 5.03% in the critical shock wave velocity necessary for transition to detonation for all mixtures considered. For example in stoichiometric mixture with 5% methane in fuel (95% hydrogen in fuel) in air the transition to detonation velocity was approx. 752 m/s (an increase of 37 m/s from hydrogen-air) corresponding to M = 1.89 (an increase of 0.14 from hydrogen-air) and 75.7% (an increase of 4.7% from hydrogen-air) of speed of sound in products. Also similar to hydrogen-air mixture the transition to detonation velocity increased for leaner and richer mixture. Moreover it was observed that methane addition in general increased the pressure limit at the corner necessary for transition to detonation.

A field test series where a composite pressure vessel for hydrogen is exploded by fire 1) to provide the facts and the data for the safety distance based on overpressure; 2) to validate the current status of mitigation barrier per KGS FP216 and further designs for developments of the codes and standards relating to hydrogen refueling stations. A pair of barriers to be tested are installed approximately 4 m apart standing face to face. The explosion source is a type-4 composite vessel of 175 L filled with compressed hydrogen up to 70 MPa. The vessel is in the middle of the barriers and the body part is heated with an LPG burner until it blows out. The incident overpressures from the blast are measured with 40 high-speed pressure sensors which are respectively installed 2 to 32 m away from the explosion. In the tests with the barrier constructed per the current status of KGS FP216 the explosion of the vessel resulted in partial destruction of the reinforced concrete barrier and made the steel plate barrier dissociated from the foundation then flew away approximately 25 m. The peak overpressure was 14.65 kPa at 32 m. The test data will be further analyzed to select the barriers for the subsequent tests and to develop the codes and standards for hydrogen refueling stations.

Among the new energy carriers aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions the use of hydrogen is expected to grow significantly in various applications and sectors (i.e. industrial commercial transportation etc.) due to its high energy content by weight and zero carbon emissions. The increasingly widespread use of hydrogen will require massive distribution from production sites to final consumers and the delivery by means of liquid hydrogen road tankers may be a suitable cost-effective option for market penetration in the short-medium term. Liquid hydrogen (LH2) presents different hazards compared to gaseous hydrogen and an accidental release in confined spaces such as road tunnels might lead to the formation of a flammable hydrogen cloud that might deflagrate or even detonate. Nevertheless the potential negative effects on users in the event of accidental leakage of liquid hydrogen from a tanker in road tunnels so far have not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore a 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics model for the release of LH2 and its dispersion within a road tunnel was developed in this study. The proposed model was validated by a comparison with certain experimental and numerical studies found in the literature. Such modeling is demanding for long tunnels. Therefore the results of the simulations (e.g. the amount of hydrogen contained within the cloud) were combined with established simplified consequence methods to estimate the overpressures generated from a potential hydrogen deflagration. This was then used to evaluate the effects on users while evacuating from the tunnel. The findings showed that the worst scenario is when the release is in the middle of the tunnel length and the ignition occurs 90 s after the leakage.

Further development of hydrogen-fuelled transport and associated infrastructure requires fundamentally based validated and publicly accepted models for fuelling protocol development particularly for heavy-duty transport applications where protocols are not available yet. This study aims to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for modelling the entire hydrogen refuelling station (HRS) including all its components starting from high-pressure (HP) tanks a mass flow meter pressure control valve (PCV) a heat exchanger (HE) nozzle hose breakaway and up to 3 separate onboard tanks. The paper focuses on the initial phase of the refuelling procedure in which the main purpose is to check for leaks in the fuelling line and determine if it is safe to start fuelling. The simulation results are validated against the only publicly available data on hydrogen fuelling by Kuroki and co-authors (2021) from the NREL hydrogen fuelling station experiment. The simulation results – mass flow rate dynamics as well as pressure and temperature at different station locations - show good agreement with the measured experimental data. The development of such models is crucial for the further advancement of hydrogen-fuelled transport and infrastructure and this study presents a step towards this goal.

HyCARE project supported by the Clean Hydrogen Partnership of the European Union deals with a prototype of hydrogen storage tank using a solid-state hydrogen carrier. Up to 40 kilograms of hydrogen are stored in twelve tanks at less than 50 barg and less than 100 °C. The innovative design is based on a standard twenty-foot container including twelve TiFe-based metal hydride (MH) hydrogen storage tanks coupled with a thermal energy storage in phase change materials (PCM). This article aims at showing the main risks related to hydrogen storage in a MH system and the safety barriers considered based on HyCARE’s specific risk analysis.<br/>Regarding the TiFe MH material used to store hydrogen experimental tests showed that the exposure of the MH to air or water did not cause spontaneous ignition. Furthermore an explosion within the solid MH cannot propagate due to internal pore size. Additionally in case of leakage the speed of hydrogen desorption from the MH is self-limited which is an important safety characteristic since it reduces the potential consequences from the hydrogen release scenario.<br/>Regarding the integrated system the critical scenarios identified during the risk analysis were: explosion due to release of hydrogen inside or outside the container internal explosion inside MH tanks due to accidental mix of hydrogen and air and asphyxiation due to inert gas accumulation in the container. This identification phase of the risk analysis allowed to pinpoint the most relevant safety barriers already in place and recommend additional ones if needed to further reduce the risk that were later implemented.<br/>The main safety barriers identified were: material and component selection (including the MH selected) safety interlocks safety valves ventilation gas detection and safety distances.<br/>The risk management process based on risk identification and assessment contributed to coherently integrate inherently safe design features and safety barriers.

The PRHYDE project (PRotocol for heavy duty HYDrogEn refueling) funded by the Clean Hydrogen partnership aims at developing recommendations for heavy-duty refueling protocols used for future standardization activities for trucks and other heavy duty transport systems applying hydrogen technologies. Development of a protocol requires a validated approach. Due to the limited time and budget the experimental data cannot cover the whole possible ranges of protocol parameters such as initial vehicle pressure and temperature ambient and precooling temperatures pressure ramp refueling time hardware specifications etc. Hence a validated numerical tool is essential for a safe and efficient protocol development. For this purpose engineering tools are used. They give good results in a very reasonable computation time of several seconds or minutes. These tools provide the heat parameters estimation in the gas (volume average temperature) and 1D temperature distribution in the tank wall. The following models were used SOFIL (Air Liquide tool) HyFill (by ENGIE) and H2Fills (open access code by NREL). The comparison of modelling results and experimental data demonstrated a good capability of codes to predict the evolution of average gas temperature in function of time. Some recommendations on model validation for the future protocol development are given.

With the predicted high demand of hydrogen projected to support the neutral carbon society transition in the coming years the production of hydrogen is set to increase alongside the demand. As electrolysis is set to be amongst the main solutions for green hydrogen production ensuring the safety of electrolysers during operation will become a central concern. This is mainly due to the crossover risk (hydrogen into oxygen or the other way around) in the separators as throughout the years several cases of incidents have been reported. This study aims to evaluate the methodologies for calculating H2/O2 detonation cell size and laminar flame velocity using detailed kinetic mechanisms at the operating conditions of electrolysers (up to 35 bar and 360 K). Therefore the modeling of H2/O2 and H2/Air shock tube delay times and laminar flame speeds at initial different pressures and temperature based on the GRI mech 3.0 [1] Mevel et al.[2] Li et al.[3] Lutz et al. [4] and Burke et al. [5] kinetic mechanisms were performed and compared with the available experimental data in the literature. In each case a best candidate mechanism was then chosen to build a database for the detonation cell size then for the laminar flame speeds up to the operating conditions of electrolysers (293-360K and 1-35 bar).

Due to the increased interest in alternative energy sources hydrogen device safety has become paramount. In this study we induced the explosion of a hydrogen tank from a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) by igniting a fire beneath it and disabling the built-in temperature pressure relief device. Three Type 4 tanks were injected gaseous hydrogen at pressures of 700 350 and 10 bar respectively. The incident pressure generated by the tank explosion was measured by pressure transducers positioned at various points around the tank. A protective barrier was installed to examine its effect on the resulting damage and the reflected pressure was measured along the barrier. The internal pressure and external temperature of the tanks were measured in multiple locations. The 700- and 350-bar hydrogen tanks exploded approximately 10 and 16 min after burner ignition respectively. The 10-bar hydrogen tank did not explode but ruptured approximately 29 min after burner ignition The explosions generated blast waves fireballs and fragments. The impact on the surrounding area was evaluated and we verified that the blast pressure fireballs and fragments were almost completely blocked by the protective barrier. The results of this study are expected to improve safety on an FCEV accident scene.

As part of the UK Government’s Net Zero targets to tackle Climate Change the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) aims to reach an authoritative view on the safety of using 100% hydrogen for heating across the UK to feed into Government policy decisions by the mid-2020s. This paper describes the background and process of a programme of work led by HSE in support of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (formerly BEIS) that will inform strategic policy decisions by 2026. The strategic framework of HSE’s programme of work was defined between BEIS and HSE. HSE’s programme of work follows on from a previous project which engaged with HSE policy regulatory and scientific colleagues working with industry stakeholders identifying knowledge gaps for the safe distribution storage and use of hydrogen gas in domestic industrial and commercial premises. These knowledge gaps were subsequently used in discussions with stakeholders to prioritise research projects and evidence gathering exercises. To review this scientific evidence HSE developed a review framework and convened Evidence Review Groups (ERGs) to cover all evidence areas encompassing topics such as quantified risk assessment material compatibility and operational procedures. These ERGs include representation from relevant divisions across HSE (policy regulation and science). The paper explains the structure of HSE’s input into the hydrogen for heating programme the ERG process and timelines along with the proposed outputs. Additional activities have been undertaken by HSE within the programme to highlight specific issues in support of the review process which will also be discussed.

Hydrogen offers the UK a unique opportunity to deliver on our Net Zero ambitions enabling deep decarbonisation of the parts of the energy system that are challenging to electrify balancing the energy system by providing large scale long duration energy storage and reducing pressure on electricity infrastructure. The UK Government in recognition of the centrality of hydrogen to the future energy system has set a 10GW hydrogen production ambition to be achieved by 2030. This ambition and its supporting policies such as the Hydrogen Business Model the Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard and the Hydrogen Transport and Storage Business Models will unlock private sector investment and kick-start the UK’s hydrogen activity. Encouragingly the UK has a positive track record of deploying low carbon technologies. The  combination of the UK’s world leading policies and incentive schemes alongside a vibrant  Research Development and Innovation (RD&I)  and engineering environment has enabled rapid  deployment of technologies such as offshore wind  and electric vehicles. Yet despite being world leaders  in deployment early opportunities for regional  supply chain growth and job creation were not fully  realised and taken advantage of from inception. The  hydrogen sector is therefore at a tipping point. To  capitalise on the economic opportunity hydrogen  offers the UK must learn from prior technology  deployments and build a strong domestic hydrogen  supply chain in parallel to championing deployment.

Hydrogen is unique amongst low carbon  technologies. It represents a significant economic  opportunity with future hydrogen markets estimated  by the Hydrogen Innovation Initiative to be worth  $8tn and hydrogen technology markets estimated to reach $1tn by 20501 but crucially it is also still a nascent market. Unlike many other low carbon technologies where supply chains are already well established hydrogen supply chains are embryonic meaning that the UK has an opportunity to anchor these supply chains here and establish itself as a global leader.

The UK is well placed to capitalise on this opportunity with favourable geography and geology  that enables us to produce and store hydrogen cost effectively coupled with a strong pipeline of hydrogen projects a stable policy environment that is attractive to investors and a wealth of transferable skills and expertise from the oil and gas industry.

We must ensure that alongside our focus on deployment we are also investing in technology and supply chains. Not only will this deliver exponential economic benefits from the projects supported by Government but it will also enable us to tackle increasing global supply chain constraints. Hydrogen UK estimated in its Economic Impact Assessment that hydrogen could deliver 30000 jobs annually and £7bn of GVA by 2030

It is important to be targeted and strategic in our investment and activities and recognise that hydrogen represents a wide range of technologies and the UK should not expect to lead in every area. Hydrogen UK with the support of the Hydrogen Delivery Council has undertaken analysis of the hydrogen value chain building on UK strengths and identifying the high value items that can deliver significant impact and benefit to the UK. We have also conducted widespread engagement with project developers to identify the barriers to utilising UK technology in projects and with technology developers to identify the challenges and barriers to investing and siting development and manufacturing in the UK.

The report can be found on Hydrogen UK's website.